Expertise's Politics and Sports Blog


Thursday, January 20, 2005
Boxer must have been punch-drunk

I've been paying attention to Dr. Rice's confirmation hearing as well.

And I'm watching a new champion for the left emerge in Congress.  Barbara Boxer, who now has six more years before she's directly held accountable for these foolish actions after winning reelection in November, has made quite a bit of noise this month.

I won't go into it too much, since KingBarber and most of the right side of the blogosphere have ranted enough for all of us combined.  However, I did want to place my five cents into it.

You see, it's events like these that make the blogosphere the premiere source of information in the world.  You really can be an "instapundit".  Unfortunately for Dr. Rice, she's being put on the spot, and can't take time to look at what Sen. Boxer and others have said on the very issue they've impuning her on.

CrushKerry was one of the first to expose Boxer's false claim of the content within the Iraqi War Resolution.  It was far from being only or even primarily about weapons of mass destruction.  Then again, she never knew it because she didn't read it.

Somehow she also forgotten that she admitted there were WMD's in Iraq a little more than two years ago.  Here's what Sen. Boxer said in November 2002:
"Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement."
For Democrats in Washington, history started yesterday, and anything before that only happened the way they "remember" it.  Thus, they can't be held accountable for the things they said even a couple of weeks ago.

That's not the only thing.  Boxer also distorted Rice's statement to Senator Voinovich in regards to the tsunami.  Here's what Dr. Rice actually said:

VOINOVICH: I think what we're doing in the tsunami right now is wonderful. I think it's -- but we have got to show people that we love them, that we are for democracy, that we want them to enjoy the same thing but we haven't any hidden motives.

What are you planning on doing in that area to respond to that?

RICE: Senator, first of all, I do agree that the tsunami was a wonderful opportunity to show not just the U.S. government, but the heart of the American people. And I think it has paid great dividends for us.
Thus, Rice was responding to Voinovich's comment on how the federal government could eliminate any worries about "hidden motives".  Not only did Boxer take the comment out of context - making it seem as if the Bush Administration was exploiting the situation - but she was responding to a question that Voinovich asked.

Boxer and her ilk aren't done yet.  Even though the Senate Foreign Relations Panel approved her 16-2, they are trying to get it delayed until next week, as to not confirm her on the same day Bush is inaugurated for his second term. 

Why?  Simply out of spite.  Democrats claim they want to debate Rice's confirmation for a few more hours.  What good will come out of that?  It makes no sense for Democrats to delay the obvious, especially since they are more than willing to confirm the cabinet positions of Mike Johanns, the new Agriculture Secretary, and Margaret Spellings, the new Education Secretary.

One day Democrats will learn that it's childish behavior like this that will continue to keep them in the minority of Congress and out of the White House.

UPDATE:  Another lie was found by James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal's Best of the Web.  Boxer claimed 25% of our servicemen that have been killed in Iraq were from California.  She wasn't even halfway right; it's only 11.7%, according to Casualties.org.

Posted at 03:33 am by Expertise
Comments (3)  

Home




Wednesday, January 19, 2005
Manning and Culpepper.

Indy quarterback Peyton Manning and Minnesota QB Daunte Culpepper are seen as the top two quarterbacks in the NFL today.  This year, Manning broke Marino's 20-year touchdown passing record with 49 this season.  Culpepper was in a zone all year, throwing for over 5,000 passing yards this season.

On Sunday, both of these great quarterbacks were stopped yet again in their quest for a trip to the Super Bowl.  Culpepper was humbled by Philadelphia, while Manning was completely shut down by New England.  Both of them have to wait for another January to reach the pinnacle of any football player's career.

What can these two do to get their teams on the same page as they are in order to get over the hump? 

Culpepper's scenario is much easier to figure out, yet much harder to accomplish.  They need help with the secondary, which gave up more yards than any team to make the playoffs in NFL history.  They also needs a defensive coordinator that isn't afraid to get physical and can come up with defensive schemes that will finally put some pressure on the opposing quarterback.

Unfortuately, the Vikings aren't willing to do that.  Mike Tice will continue to be a player's coach, which means he will bring on someone - or keep someone -  that will work around the players instead of the players conforming to the gameplan that's desirable and effective to score victories.  As many games as Minnesota lost due to last minute defensive chokes, heads should have rolled.

The best way to help them through this situation is by trading Randy Moss.  Culpepper can get by without Moss, and his talent and the defensive personnel gained by doing so could make up for the loss of Moss's talent.  But it's obvious that in order for Minnesota to make it to the next level, something's got to change.

As for Manning, Indy's problems are much harder.  The team is as good as it's ever been.  However, they do need to invest in some secondary that can get physical with receivers and make plays against some of the taller wideouts.  Being a former defensive coordinator, Dungy should be able to get those guys trained to knock some receivers around.

But the main problem is how the Indianapolis receiver corp reacts to physical defenses, as they were dropping passes left and right throughout the game.  Temperature and weather conditions may have been a factor in their loss, but the bottom line is that the receivers need to man up.  Edge needs to step up his game next year too, if he decides to stay at Indy.

Regardless, it's going to be hard for both teams to do anything that will make them stronger teams and get over key obstacles next season.  Hopefully, these two won't suffer the same fate Dan Marino did; a good quarterback who never won the big one.

Posted at 12:31 am by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home




Sunday, January 16, 2005
Divisional Playoffs recap.

Well, the home teams won, and out of those winners, three of the four won decisively.

Since it's still fresh in my mind, let me talk about how Indianapolis was absolutely drug through the snow at Foxboro against the Patriots. 

It was one of those games where nothing but the score stayed close throughout the game.  Manning only got into the redzone once, and that resulted in the only field goal of the game.  Despite the new receiver contact rule, New England's secondary made a mockery out of Indy's receiver corp.  There was nothing they could do to move the ball down the field and complete the drives they've been doing all year.

And please note; this year's Indianapolis Colts had the fourth highest scoring percentage in NFL history, yet they only managed three points today.  Manning had no one to throw to, he was being pressured by the defensive line and linebacker set, and James was ineffective while running the ball.  Three and out was the name of the game all day for the Colts.

Meanwhile, Tom Brady continued to be Tom Brady.  Despite being pressured by the best pass rusher in the league, Dwight Freeney, he was able to get off his trademark short passes and move the ball downfield.  Corey Dillon was the workhorse, bouncing off of blockers and breaking tackles throughout the game.  Indianapolis never had a chance against all of these factors.

Brady and Dillon slow-grinded that defense.  Take a look at the drive summary for the game.  There was one drive in the third quarter where they steadily went downfield and eventually scored a touchdown on that took over eight minutes on, and another one that took seven and a half.  Hell, Manning only got four chances to score in the second half.  You're not going to win football games like that.

Everyone, including me, has been talking about how the Indianapolis Colts has been unstoppable all year, and Peyton Manning is at the top of his game.  However, we forgot about Brady's consistency and the genius of the best coach in the National Football League, Bill Bellichek.  If I was the Steelers, I would be very afraid of this team next Sunday. 

Why?  Because Saturday evening the Steelers had to pull some luck to walk out of Heinz Field with a win over the Jets.  If it wasn't for the Jets missing two fg's - one in the fourth that hit the crossbar and another in overtime that went wide left - the Steelers would be taking an early winter vacation.

If I was a Steeler fan, I wouldn't get too excited about that win.  This is the same Jets team that lost to the Rams to close out the regular season and just barely got into the playoffs.  And the Steelers looked quite normal on Saturday evening.

Big Ben Roethlisberger, the rookie quarterback that is the Baby Jesus of the Steel Curtain, looked like a rookie playing against the Jets, making erratic passes and throwing picks.  The Bus and the Duce had to work for every rushing yard they got, and Jets QB Chad Pennington had a decent game against that Steelers' secondary.  If Roethlisberger plays like that against New England's patchwork secondary, and the Steelers' secondary allows Brady to make plays to compliment the rushing prowess of Dillon, who didn't play in the first game between these two teams during the regular season, The Bus will make an early visit into that retirement junkyard.

The NFC playoffs saw two blowouts that either team should be that excited about.

Saturday's game was a farce.  The St. Louis Rams didn't deserve to be on the same field as Atlanta, much less the playoffs.  And I never saw a team that could have been beaten solely by their opponent's special teams offense, as Allen Rossum averaged a playoff-record 49.7 yards per return.

I say solely because Michael Vick and Warrick Dunn turned the game into a marathon, running for a combined 317 yards in the game.  The Rams' front line should have just stepped aside and allowed the Falcons to do what they wanted.  And you know things are bad when Peerless Price is making touchdown catches.

You have to feel sorry for Marc Bulger.  He is a good quarterback, but the fact is that he can't do it alone.  He has the sorriest coach in the league right now that simply wastes the talent on that team.  They have a potentially good running back in Stephen Jackson that could be part of the future of that franchise if put to use, but all Martz wants to focus on is the passing game.  The Rams secondary has some athletic DB's, but it means nothing because the Rams don't have any kind of pass rush from their front line and linebackers.  Until Martz is gone, the fact is the Rams will struggle.

As for Minnesota, they returned to normal today after stepping it up last week and lost to Philly.

If I was Vikings owner Red McCombs, I would fire the Vikings' defensive coordinator.  It was as if they never watched last year's NFC Championship Game, and thus made Freddie "The People's Champ" Mitchell and Todd Pinkston look like All-Pro receivers.  They played those two soft, and did not draw pressure onto Donovan McNabb.  McNabb had plenty of time in the pocket to make any pass he wanted.

Meanwhile, there's Mike Tice, who panicked after falling behind 21-7 in the second quarter and started making erratic playcalls that eventually blew the game for them.  The Vikings played as if every drive was their last, rather than making sound plays that would move the ball down the field and put points on the board.  Tice is another coach who can not seem to draw upon the talent that's on that team.  Allow Culpepper to run the offense, but the emphasis this offseason should be the defense.

I'll talk about the conflicts that Culpepper and Manning both have with their respective teams, as well as review the conference championship games later this week.

Posted at 10:35 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home

Vision Circle vs. Malkin

The other day I was blogsurfing and through LaShawn's site I found a little tidbit on the Vision Circle blog.

So, Michelle Malkin gets hate mail. What's the big deal?

Really.

What makes her special?

Putting this off on Armstrong Williams is low.

Real low.

She's whining. She's playing victocrat/victim/victimology.

The email is foul, but still...

 He's reacting to Malkin's blog post, as well as her syndicated column.  Malkin was saying she was getting hate mail asking or accusing her of being on the take like Armstrong Williams.

I have to agree with Vision Circle.  Malkin isn't dumb.  She knows how the pundit game goes.  Anyone that gives political opinions are sure to expect some to like you and others to hate you.  And yes, the criticism that comes from your opinions do not have limits and will include every blow-below-the-belt you could think of.  While such statements are unwarranted and are disgraceful, it should be expected.

I gave up on the idea long ago that every person in the world is civilized enough to have a civil discusssion.  As time has gone by, insults and spiteful comments are the norm within society and the politicial spectrum rather than the latter.  I'm sure plenty of people wish there was another way, but that's simply how it is.

Thus it really makes no sense for Malkin to attempt to make a connection between her hate mail and Williams, since 1.  she was receiving hate mail before all of this went down, and 2.  the ones that wrote her after the Williams incident to rant about being on the take probably didn't like her before the incident and still wouldn't even if the scandal never happened.

When I engage in political discussions on message boards on the internet with leftists, I expect to be called everything but a child of God, and true to form, I have been.  Uncle Tom, nigger, porch monkey, Bush jockrider, fascist, bootlicker, etc....and these are some of the nicer terms.   At first, it irked me, because they didn't know me or my background and they ignorantly assumed that to be conservative means to turn your back on black people and to want to be white.

Eventually, you realize that they have no basis in order to make these assusations and insults, and I have a choice in how to respond:  ignore them or expose them for the fools they are.  Sooner or later they'll either get tired of the silence or the bombs dropping over their heads and they'll retreat back into the cracks in the walls.  Standing around complaining about racial slurs being hurled at you only makes you appear weak and allows the ones who throw them to get some comfort in making you uncomfortable.

Regardless, Williams isn't the reason why Malkin will get more hate mail these days, and even if she gets more, so what?  Suck it up, get over it and continue to do what you've been doing.

Posted at 03:27 am by Expertise
Comments (1)  

Home




Friday, January 14, 2005
Self-righteousness comes home to roost.

On Monday night I talked about Criticism vs. Self-Righteousness, and I gave this fair warning:

It would help a few people, before they go on tirades about Williams's behavior, to recall any mistakes made in their life.  I'm sure all can think of a few.  The man has apologized, and it's not as if he has a history of such behavior.  It's time to break up the posse and move on.

Now, chalk it up to the fact that I didn't post this soon enough, or my blog viewership is so small that my messages don't spread wide enough.  But the message was something that people should have took heed of.

One of those people is Markos Zuniga, the owner of the Daily Kos.  On Friday, Kos commented on a passage by David Corn from The Nation.  Corn said:

"This happens all the time," he told me. "There are others." Really? I said. Other conservative commentators accept money from the Bush administration? I asked Williams for names. "I'm not going to defend myself that way," he said. The issue right now, he explained, was his own mistake. Well, I said, what if I call you up in a few weeks, after this blows over, and then ask you? No, he said.
And to this, Kos responds:

Until names are named, we can assume every conservative pundit is on the White House's payola rolls.

It's a shameful barb, and although he probably won't admit it, I bet it's one that Kos wishes he never made.  Yesterday the internet campaign leader of Howard Dean's 2004 presidential campaign, Zephyr Teachout of Zonkette, made a public omission of her own:

On Dean’s campaign, we paid Markos and Jerome Armstrong as consultants, largely in order to ensure that they said positive things about Dean. We paid them over twice as much as we paid two staffers of similar backgrounds, and they had several other clients.

While they ended up also providing useful advice, the initial reason for our outreach was explicitly to buy their airtime. To be very clear, they never committed to supporting Dean for the payment -- but it was very clearly, internally, our goal.

Now, Kos for the most part was being duped, and thought they really wanted him and Armstrong, who runs the MyDD blog, for technical support.  You can't fault him there.  He also put up a disclaimer, which said he was being paid to provide technical support to the campaign.

This isn't a question about ethics in the case of Kos, as he's pretty clear on that end.  However, now that we know there are leftists that are being paid by the politicans that they comment on, should we follow Kos's lead and assume that all of the left-wing commentators are being paid off as well?

So, what chu talkin bout, Willis?

Ha.  Maybe you guys will take caution in choosing your words when the next big story hits.

But hey, at least Kos will have his name in the news.  He'll be in tomorrow's Wall Street Journal.

Posted at 03:36 am by Expertise
Comments (3)  

Home




Thursday, January 13, 2005
Playoffs post.

Lemme talk about the other games last weekend...

It was great to see Herman Edwards get that big win in San Diego.  I'm sure that had to be vindication for losing to St. Louis two weekends ago.  People are still talking about that big outburst on the sidelines at his assistant coach, however.  Usually Edwards is a calmer guy.

As for the Chargers, there really isn't much to say.  They played a good game, but Chad Pennington was in a zone.  Curtis Martin was being Curtis Martin, and that's a hard combo to overcome, especially when the Chargers played from behind most of the game.  However, they shouldn't feel too bad, because no one during preseason thought the Chargers would be half as successful as they were this season.

Denver was sure they'd be able to compete with the Colts on Sunday.  After all, they supposedly upgraded their secondary in the offseason, fired their defensive coordinator last year (Oh yeah; that same defensive coordinator now works for Atlanta.  I'm sure he enjoyed watching that game.), got rid of Brian Griese and picked up that lethal weapon: Jake "The Snake" Plummer.

Well, at halftime the game looked like the video game Madden NFL 05, only with better graphics.  Although Jake didn't make too many dumb mistakes, the defense was shredded to pieces by the NFL's MVP Peyton Manning.  I guess winning Sunday, despite Manning only playing one offensive series, gassed the Broncos' heads up just a little too much.  Someone should have reminded them that they barely made the playoffs, and their secondary really hadn't been up to snuff all year long.

If there is a team scarier than Indianapolis, I don't know who it is.  Peyton Manning has never played better, Edgerin James is healthy and running hard, Manning has more weapons than ever, and in Dwight Freeney they have the best pass rusher in the game right now.  This week they face their archnemesis, New England.

St. Louis beat a team that finds ways to lose.  Big whoop.  Bulger has been playing excellent, however, since coming back from that injury just before the close of the season.  Stephen Jackson has been running the ball quite well too.  In fact, he led the NFL this year with 5 yards per carry.  It's simply too bad that neither of them have a coach that can utilize the weapons on that team effectively.  Under Mike Martz, the Rams have been a very underachieving team this year.

Let's talk about this weekend's games.  First, St. Louis at Atlanta.

If Stephen Jackson touches the ball more than 10 times in this game, it'll shock the hell out of me.  Atlanta's defense is contoured to stop the run.  Besides, we know Martz never tries to establish a running game. 

Bulger's arm is strong enough and accurate enough to get the long ball over Atlanta's weak secondary.  The only question is if Atlanta can put on a decent pass rush to frustrate Bulger into making mistakes and getting some sacks.  It's definitely possible.

Vick is hurt, and Duckett is coming back from an injury.  Neither one of them is expected to be 100%.  But Vick doesn't know the meaning of pocket passing, and will try to use his feet to get him out of trouble.  The good thing for Atlnata is that the Rams don't have a front line or linebacker set that can even catch him on two-hand tag.  And expect Algee Crumpler to have a big day.

It will be a close game, as it always is in Atlanta games.  Therefore, Atlanta would be well advised to sit back, take it easy and let Mike Martz screw up to give you the win.

Vikings at Philly.  This is no doubt the most intriguing game this weekend.  Philly has benched their starters for the last three weeks (they had the bye last week) and their primary offensive weapon, Terrell Owens, is on the shelf until the Super Bowl, if they make it there.

Both teams have circumstances going for them and against them this week.  The Vikings don't have to worry about TO.  That's a big relief in and of itself.  Considering McNabb and the receiver corps haven't played a full game in almost a month, they're going to come out rusty.  And the spotlight is on Philly receivers Todd Pinkston and Freddie Mitchell, in that they have to step up and produce to make up for TO.  Without TO, that offense is much worse than last year, as they let Duce Staley and James Thrash go in the offseason.

As for the Vikings, Randy Moss isn't 100%, as he aggravated a previous ankle injury in last week's game against the Packers.  That cuts Culpepper's options severely.  Moss didn't work out on Wednesday, deciding to rest that leg.

McNabb will also face off against the worst pass defense in playoff history.    That should be a little reassuring, and will help him get to Pinkston and Mitchell.  However, if that defense comes in playing like they did last week, that might now bode too well for Philly.  And Brett Farve is more accurate than Donovan McNabb.

A lot of people are calling the upset in this game.  I say it all depends on which Vikings team shows up.  If they come in with the same intensity they had at Lambeau Field last week, they'll win.  But if they are sloppy, and Moss can't make plays on that foot, Philly will let Westbrook carry them to victory.

Jets at Steelers.  Can Pennington do it again?  He's going to have to have the same day he had against the Chargers and then some to pull off this upset.  Pittsburgh's defense is tough.  They are healthy, and rested.  They're also on a 14 game win streak.  Pittsburgh either matches the Jets even or better in almost every stat.

I really don't see the Jets winning this one.  The Steelers would have to underachieve to lose.  The Jets front line can't keep Roethlisberger from being able to stay versatile behind the line of scrimmage, and the two-headed monster of the Bus and the Duce will keep that ball moving and eventually pound the Jets into submission.

Colts at Patriots.  This is the boogieman that has haunted Peyton Manning for a year.  It seems as if the Colts get so close, but eventually succumb to the Patriots' D at the end of the game.

Manning is having a year that quarterbacks only dream of.  Pats coach Bill Bellicheck and Tom Brady are ready to take that plunge and get to the Super Bowl one more time.  This is a game between the unstoppable force and the immovable object.

I'm going with the unstoppable force.  Manning has conquered every defensive scheme this year, and there have been some good ones over the course of the year.  The Patriots also placed Ty Law on IR, which means Tim Brown is virtually left alone to face off against those receivers.  And how many teams are able to beat all of those weapons Indy has twice?  Realy the only thing the Pats have going for them is that Manning has to play this game in Foxboro, and it's going to be pretty cold this weekend.  The Colts are also only 2-9 against the Patriots all-time.

Another factor this weekend that the broadcast team will talk about:  the NFL decided to call illegal contact and pass interference very tight after last year's AFC title game featuring these two teams.  Don't think it wont come into play in this game.

So my picks:

- Steelers over Jets

- Falcons over Rams

- Vikings over Philly

- Colts over Pats

Posted at 05:51 am by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home




Tuesday, January 11, 2005
Sorry Ambra.

This sucks.

I think I'm going to stick with my alias for the time being.  S'not right to be dooced for speaking your mind in an atmosphere completely separate from your work.

Posted at 04:14 am by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home

More on Vikings/Packers

Rush was on a roll yesterday.  After talking about Armstrong Williams (which I talked about here), he proceeded around the end of the show to talk about Randy Moss.

And lo and behold, we were on the same side of things.  Check it out:

Anyway Moss scored the second of his two touchdowns yesterday and strode to the nearest goalpost where he simulated dropping trow and mooning packer cheesehead fans in the bleachers behind the goalpost. At the time this happened Joe Buck, the play by play man for Fox called it a disgusting move, but that's really not what was disusting. I mean the emulated moon was disusting, but then after having dropped trow, and without pretending to pick the trow back up, while then still in his pantomime still with his trowsers down, he wiped his butt on the Packers' goalpost. Folks, that was the last straw. The moon, that's one thing but wiping his butt on the Packer goalpost and enjoying it, rubbing it in there, if you will, that didn't sit well with anybody. And this, of course, has caused a reaction from all of the pontificators on all of the networks. Terry Bradshaw and Howie Long said it's hopeless for Moss, he's a bat actor he's a bad character, the league ought to suspend him, fine him, kick him out. Tom Jackson on ESPN, why, you would have thought McNabb's name had been mentioned yesterday to listen to Tom Jackson go bonkers on the ESPN program. I think it was last night, their highlight show.

Here's what Randy Moss said in the locker room when asked about the mooning and the wiping of the butt incident on the Packers goalpost.

MOSS: The celebration was more of a fun thing and not more of a hatred thing; you know what I'm saying? I just tried to enjoy myself and as you see after the play my teammates came and smacked my helmet and picked me up in the air and things like that so that's why I say I was just playing and having fun man, you know, just caught a touchdown in a big game, I don't even know what quarter it was but I know it was a big game late in the second half, and, you know, I was just very enthused, and that's what I felt like doing.

RUSH: I don't know what quarter it was, but it was late in the second half. That would be the fourth quarter, Randy. Here's what Tom Jackson said on NFL prime-time on ESPN last night.

JACKSON: I cannot talk about this any more. I can't talk about Randy Moss and his responsibility to his football team, to the league, to the game itself. He will have to make decisions on his own, commissioner, team, owner, Red McCombs will have to make those decisions as to how to get through to him. We cannot. I said it this morning. He's made it clear to me that no one can tell him what to do or when to do it, and he acts that out all the time. So those issues right now, as far as I'm concerned, are for somebody else.

RUSH: Now, stop and think of that. Randy Moss is supposed to listen to a bunch of TV commentators in pre-game shows telling him what to do, when to do it, what not to do, and when not to do it, so Tom Jackson, who is I guess the morality czar of the ESPN pre-game show is now effectively wiping his hands of Randy Moss and is going to leave it up to the league, his teammates, and to his owner, Red McCombs. Oh, they were all high dudgeon over this, they were beside themselves that Moss had done this, and taken away the victory and the celebration of victory from his teammates by stealing the spotlight, mooning the Packer fans and then wiping his butt on their goalpost, probably had some Pimp Juice after the game, too.

Tom Jackson comes across as someone's father who's exhausted of their juvenile deliquent child.  Problem is, Moss isn't TJ's child, nor should he try to tell someone else how they should act.  Moss knows the difference between right and wrong.  If he doesn't, let him learn it the hard way.  Sitting back and trying to dispense fake moral outrage as if you're his guardian is ridiculous.

But Rush hit the nail on the head with this comment:

I mean, I just find some of this, I'm not supporting what Moss did, don't misunderstand, when I saw it I had the same reaction that everybody else did and knew what the reaction was going to be. You know, some of the characters in this league that get celebrated, some of the characters in this league that are held up as role models and so forth and then you got Randy Moss only because he doesn't kiss their behinds. He doesn't seek their approval. He doesn't go out and try to be a model with phony charitable involvement and this sort of thing, so he's made himself a target. I guess he's got the personality type that likes that.

and later:

And I tell you, if you didn't see this live and you came in late in the day and you turned on TV and you heard sports people talking about this, I will lay you ten to one you probably thought Randy Moss actually dropped trow and actually mooned the crowd. You probably thought that's what had happened, since they weren't showing the replay. It was so bad, they were so righteously indignant, they were so appalled at what Randy Moss had done that they wouldn't replay it, and yet the stuff that gets televised on prime-time television at night, broadcast television, this pales in comparison to some of it. So you can't take Randy Moss out of the equation. He's earned it. I mean, he's earned the attention. He's earned the label of bad boy. And his antics give some of these people in football the opportunity to get on their moral high horse and show how sweet and pure they are and how they've got standards and so forth. He serves a purpose for him. But the outrage, the mock outrage over this, I'm sorry, does not match the action.

Now, if he'd actually mooned the crowd, I could understand them not showing that again. But to not show this and to act like you're protecting the young eyeballs of the nation and the children and the women, we're not going to show you this, it's too disgusting, that's just, even with the cultural decay that has occurred in the country, that is a bit over the top.

Randy Moss isn't Peyton Manning.  He isn't Tom Brady.  He's Randy Moss.  And because he isn't like those guys, the announcers want to take the time to show moral outrage.

Does Terry Bradshaw show his outrage when Fox airs "Temptation Island"?  Where was Howie Long when Fox aired "Who's Your Daddy?"  Was TJ scolding the ABC brass when "Desperate Housewives" debuted?  Spare me the drama guys.

If there is anything to be pissed at Randy Moss about, it's this:

RUSH: Now, you have just, and I want to applaud you for this. You have just swerved into what to me is the real question. Why doesn't Randy Moss play every game with that much fire? How come it took an incident with him walking off the field before the game was over being chastised by teammates for him to come out and actually give it his all? Now, here's a guy that can selectively turn it on, you're supposed to go a hundred percent in every game and he has said if he's not in a play if his route is not being called, he's going to dog it. That didn't sit well with these guys who went all out on every play throughout their whole careers, yada yada yada yada. But it is an interesting point. The Vikings came out all fired up yesterday.

Precisely.  If the Vikings play with the same heart and passion they played with going into Lambeau Field, not only will they make it to Jacksonville, but they'll WIN in Jacksonville.  Minnesota has always had the talent.  They just don't believe in themselves.  That's why they continued to choke all season.  The Vikings shouldn't have to wait until some controversy is over their heads to play like winners, and we shouldn't have to wait until Monday nght for Moss to put on a big game.  But in today's NFL you can't win on just talent alone.  You've got to want to win. 

Moss, Culpepper, and that defense need to find a bigger chip to place on their shoulders, march into the Vet like they own it, and beat Philly's ass as if they didn't deserve to be on the same field as them. 

They did it to Brett Farve.  Now do it to Donovan McNabb.

Oh; and don't worry guys.  I didn't forget the rest of the playoffs.  I'll talk about the rest of the Wild Card and this weekend's games in the next day or two.

Posted at 01:30 am by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home




Monday, January 10, 2005
Criticism vs. Self Righteousness.

When put in the proper context, there can be a very thin line between the two.

When I first heard about Armstrong Williams and the payments, I criticized the ordeal.  Williams know he was wrong, and he has stated it.  At the very least, he should have disclosed that he had been paid to speak on behalf of a government policy.  By not doing so, he hurt other minorities that were involved within the political spectrum.  Tribune had every right to cancel Williams's column with them on the failure to disclose that information, and if TV One cancels his show on their network and America's Black Forum asks Williams to leave, it's simply the consequences of his actions.

But let's not get this twisted; Williams wasn't trying to sully conservatives or trying to kill the conservative movement with this incident.  He didn't have an axe to grind by doing this, and since he's human, he does make mistakes.  It seems to me as if people are trying to use this incident to go into shark mode at the first drop of blood hitting the water.

It would help a few people, before they go on tirades about Williams's behavior, to recall any mistakes made in their life.  I'm sure all can think of a few.  The man has apologized, and it's not as if he has a history of such behavior.  It's time to break up the posse and move on. 

Besides, Williams has a lot more to worry about than a bunch of talking heads throwing down indignation from up high.  As Lartigue said, that $240K will come in handy.  (I also agreed with Lartigue that his arguments were indeed lightweight, and I felt he was the black conservative whipping boy for the left from way back.  The black equivalent of Tucker Carlson, if you will.)

I listened to Limbaugh today, and there were several things that really struck home with me.  Here's one of them:

Folks, stick with me here. Principal journalists don't get $250,000 from government agencies to go out and promote what they're talking about, but then again Armstrong Williams doesn't get countless invitations to all the A-list cocktail parties where he can eat for nothing and drink for nothing and hobnob and hang around with all these people. What's the dollar value of becoming close friends with all your sources? What's the dollar value if you're a liberal journalist to being invited to all the right places and get to meet all the rightly people learn all the right spin, given all the right stuff to go out and spread the news in your own way? What's the difference? The difference is, that ostensibly isn't coming from government, the 240 grand for Armstrong Williams came from government.

Now, he's apologized, and that was a proper thing to do. But as I say, go back to the top of the question: What are they really upset about? Are they upset about the ethics of Armstrong Williams or are they upset about the money? Because I will bet you a dollar to a doughnut that Armstrong Williams would not shill for Hillary Clinton for all the money in the world. But how many of his critics would. How many of his critics do? How many of his critics out there shilling for the Clintons, shilling for Hillary no matter what they know; no matter who they know it from, no matter what they know to be the truth. How many of these people out there shilling for Bill Burkett? How many people shilling for all these Bush enemies from his Texas days, trying to get him on this National Guard story? How many people in the media shilling for things? One thing I know about Armstrong Williams: He's not going to shill for something he doesn't believe in. But I can't say that about the other guys.

The same could be asked about conservative pundits, too.  Are you mad because of the ethics, or the money?  How many pundits consort and hobnob with Republican politicans, and other pundits?  How many get invited to cruises, or get lucrative speaking engagements?

Does anyone recall the same criticism levied during the election period, when a Boston Globe reporter wrote an article saying a Swiftboat Vet had recanted his accusations against John Kerry, all the time while covering the Kerry campaign for the paper and writing the forward for the initial book for the Kerry campaign.  He had been covering John Kerry for years, and this book was one of the perks of doing so.  So let's not act as if it's something new or shocking.  Plenty of people get perks from the people they cover and network with as a result of being a pundit or a journalist.

But hey, maybe it's just me.  I see the amount of indignation shown towards Williams - a bit of it in a self-righteous tone - and then I think, "If I was in the same situation, would they do that to me?"  It's the ole "kick em while they're down" approach.  The one thing Armstrong Williams will definitely learn from this incident is the people who are truly his friends and colleagues and who aren't.

UPDATE:  A very good post by Jeremy Pierce at Parableman.  There has indeed been some misconceptions going around about this whole scenario.

Posted at 11:40 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home




Sunday, January 09, 2005
Vikings/Packers recap.

Let me go ahead and get the Vikes/Packers game out of the way.

Wow.

That was the most entertaining game I've seen in a while.  As Culpepper stated after the game, the Vikings came into Lambeau Field with a chip on his shoulder and they took it out on the Vikings.  They rolled to a 17-0 lead in the first quarter and never looked back.

And Brett Farve looked like the same Brett Farve a few weeks ago when he was rolled over by Jacksonville at Lambeau Field, giving up four picks and just playing terribly sloppy.  The Vikings defense played with a purpose, as they had given up more passing yards than any team to make the playoffs in NFL history.

But it was Randy Moss's day.  Randy Moss made two of the biggest plays of the day, and the last one being a flare pass off an audible while Moss was virtually JOGGING with a sprained ankle.  After the past week with heavy criticism being thrown at Moss for walking off the field in the game against Washington and comments about Mike Tice, this was definitely vindication for Moss.

However, with the way Fox Sports was calling the game, with their announcing crew of Joe Buck, Troy Aikman and Chris Collingsworth, you'd think they were wearing cheeseheads throughout the game.  You can tell that crew, along with James Brown, Terry Bradshaw, Howie Long, and Jimmy Johnson at the sports desk, had a mission today, and that was to trash the Vikings and Randy Moss when they eventually lost to the Packers today.  The Vikings obviously didn't show up for the broadcast meeting this morning, and didn't go along with the plan.  That didn't stop Fox for staying with the plan, and thus, IMO, looking stupid in the process.

The broadcast crew seemed as if they were in shock, because they couldn't believe that the Vikings would respond this way after everything that went on during the week.  When Moss caught his first touchdown, the announcers went on and on about Moss pushing off.  Not only did the replay show he didn't, but it was Packers corner Al Harris that grabbed Moss.  Buck stated at the end of the game that the Vikings won "despite Randy Moss".  When the Viking offense wasn't on the field, they kept panning to Moss, who had his hair blown up into a fro.  All through the game it was about how Moss was hurting his teammates, how Moss shows no respect, etc.

To a point, they're right.  But anyone that knows anything about sports media knows they try to tell a story in the game whenever possible.  Moss and the Vikings' implosion was their story.  When Moss did his lil mooning dance after his second TD, Joe Buck had to take time to inform folks about how shocked he was and how he was SOOOO offended by the little dance.  After Moss's post-game interview, JB, Terry, Howie, and Jimmy ripped Moss for saying "we whupped their asses".

Here's a message to both Fox and ESPN:  Football is a man's sport.  It's not for chumps or dignitaries.  You take 300llb guys, put them on a field, and bust each other up.  Their jobs are to hurt the other team, and get the points on the board.  To pretend to be shocked because Randy Moss is being a non-Tom-Brady-Bunch football player so you can turn around and exploit the whole situation for more interest in next week's football game is so phony it's almost funny.

If Moss's post-game comments were so offensive and revolting, then why show it?  That interview wasn't live; it was tape-delayed.  Moss took the interview immediately after the game, Fox went to commercial after interviewing Culpepper live, then aired the interview with them censoring "ass".  Why didn't they just cut that whole response from the footage?  It was the same with Moss's TD celebration.  They could have easily cut to another camera when Moss started that celebration.  But they didn't.  Airing Moss's actions and then condemning them makes a more interesting show.  Not to mention, they help the NFL levy that fine just a LIL bit higher.

What Fox's broadcasters don't get is that Moss and the Vikings were reacting to the criticism levelled by him and his team.  THEY provided the fuel.  The Vikings turned it into motivation. 

After Moss's interview, where he accused the sports media of blowing the whole situation out of proportion, Howie Long immediately started whining, saying (paraphrase) "I don't know what Moss is talking about, we didn't start this, he did."  You're right, you didn't start it, but you were so willing to hype it. 

This is one of the few incidents where the athlete was able to get the best of the media that was ready to bury him.

Posted at 10:26 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home




Previous Page Next Page



   









Contact Me

If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:




rss feed

BLOGDRIVE
TEMPLATES

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

Blogdrive