Expertise's Politics and Sports Blog


Sunday, August 01, 2004
I told you: "No Kerry Bounce".

I stated in my DNC Roundup, John Kerry's DNC Convention speech needed to be magnificent, and it wasn't.  Hence,  the traditional bounce that presidential candidates generally get would miss him.

To be specific (and I know it's late) I expected no more than 2-3 percentage point rise after the convention.  Newsweek gave Kerry a 4 point bounce, extending the three-way race to 49% to Kerry/Edwards to 42% to Bush/Cheney and 3% to Nader/Camejo.  I don't believe that one, simply because they have Kerry/Edwards with a 7 point lead.  But it should be noted that this was the lowest convention bounce by a candidate since Newsweek has been doing their polls.

So I waited.  I figured we would have the real results by Monday.  But we didn't. USA Today tonight reports that Kerry had ABSOLUTELY NO CONVENTION BOUNCE.

In fact, John Kerry actually lost ground on Bush, falling behind 1% percentage point.  And Bush leads on their poll 50% to 46%.

There is no question about it:  The Kerry campaign is on the ropes, and their last chance is the debates.  Bush's lead will go into double digits after the RNC Convention.  The question is whether Kerry can be focused and go into the debates looking to eat away at Bush's lead, or will he go in as cocky as Al Gore did in 2000 and end up looking like a fraud.  There is no doubt in my mind that Gore's performance in the first debate ultimately cost him the election.  And he will have more problems if he continues to have campaign finance scandals.

Posted at 11:19 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home




Saturday, July 31, 2004
Huge victory for property rights advocates.

Marking one of the first steps to stop this highly deceptive and corrupt practice, the Michigan State Supreme Court overturned a key eminent domain court case from 1981 and stopped allowing governments seize private property to give to private companies.

I know this will make Neal Boortz happy, as he has been one of the biggest whistleblowers on these heinious land grabs that continue to get worse and worse.

The media claims this will put a damper on revitalization efforts in cities like Detroit, but maybe it will force them to actually improve what they do have rather than try to grab land from property owners from the outskirts and try to start anew.

Heads up to Malkin for the story.  Everyone pass this on.

Posted at 08:10 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home

I guess I should speak about Tyson.

As in a lot of boxing stories, this will end in disappointment and sadness.

Tyson could have been one of the greatest ever.  No doubt he was the hardest hitting puncher since Foreman.  The only difference was that he had the skills to go with it.

In the 80's he was arguably better than both Holyfield and Lewis were in the 90's.  But he let his anger, his "friends" and his business people take advantage of the fact that he didn't know anything about money, nor tried to sit down with him and actually tell him how he needed to act.

Now, he's 38 years old, trying to make money off of the things he did over 17 years ago.  His body is worn, he's broke, and he really doesn't have the skills to be a contender.

But when you have a sport that takes juveniles and criminals off the street and puts gloves on them to beat their opponents heads in for millions of dollars, this was, and still is, bound to happen.  These people have no concept of responsibility, and since they become some of the most famous athletes in the world, they have no concept of accountability.  And these things are getting worse instead of better.

I don't hate Mike.  I don't have any disdain for him either.  Only pity, and I hope he can get his life back together. 

Posted at 07:06 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home




Friday, July 30, 2004
Moore gets busted again.

Since the release of Fahrenheit 9/11, Michael Moore's $100 million dollar propaganda movie has been dismantled by  a  number  of  journalists.  It's well established that Michael Moore is a fraud and a liar.

Well add The Bloomington Pantagraph to that list.  Moore is accused of doctoring a front page of the newspaper he showed on the film claiming Al Gore won Florida.

A scene early in the movie that shows newspaper headlines related to the legally contested presidential election of 2000 included a shot of The Pantagraph's Dec. 19, 2001, front page, with the prominent headline: "Latest Florida recount shows Gore won election."

The paper says that headline never appeared on that day. It appeared in a Dec. 5, 2001, edition, but the headline was not used on the front page. Instead, it was found in much smaller type above a letter to the editor, which the paper says reflects "only the opinions of the letter writer."

What amazes me is that Moore actually thought he could get this mess into the movie without someone checking him on it.  Or does he play the same role the Democrats do, by thinking they can pull off stunts in Congress and make irresponsible statements in the hopes that not enough people would hear about it or would just chalk it up to "the ends justifying the means"?

Whatever it is, the man has no scruples.

Posted at 11:02 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home

DNC Roundup.

I decided last night that three posts in a day were enough, especially since I wrote in detail about them.  Hey, I knew you guys didn't want me to keep rambling on about the convention.

Hence, I decided to simply wait until after the convention and comment on a few things today:

- First of all, Kerry was not great.  I would say bombed, but he wasn't that bad.  But it was definitely the worst speech since at least Mondale.  Even Dukakis was pretty decent behind the mic.

Kerry started off shaky, then did a decent job in the middle with the visionary stuff and the rhetoric.  But then he killed off his crowd with the stump speech part of it.  He was rushing through it, trying to talk through the cheers.  That's because his speech was so long that if he did pause appropriately, it would have been well over an hour instead of 50 minutes or so.

Contrast that to Bush's 2000 speech.  His speechwriters were smart.  They anticipated both Bush's public speaking weaknesses and the long cheers of the crowd.  They made sure Bush didn't talk uninterrupted for more than a minute or two.  Therefore, they created a speech to fit him perfectly, and everyone agreed that it was good.   

His speech ranks below Clinton's (who he should have took notes from for his speech Monday), Edwards (who's speech didn't differ much from Kerry's, other than time), Sharpton's, and Obama's.  He was outshined by the ones that were supposed to help him.  People that actually watched the convention from Monday-Thursday can not be pleased at all.

- They have to do a better job with their speaker schedules.  They have guys who get the crowd rocking, then the next on deck is boring and ends up killing the crowd.

- Notice that after all that hoopla, not a word was spoken about Kerry's 20 years in the Senate outside of him working with McCain on negotiating the release of hostages from Southeast Asia. 

- Doesn't Jesse seem depressed?  He seems like his speaking skills went down a few notches as of late.  I guess he can't be too happy by watching time pass him by.

- Absolutely hilarious:  CNN slipped up and recorded the DNC Convention Director having a hissy fit over Kerry's post-speech celebration.  He was heard cursing at the guys controlling the balloons and confetti over head to bring them down.

Doesn't it seem as if there are alot of slip-ups, cursing, and visible frustration during this campaign?  In 2000 the only blooper I can think of is when Bush called some journalist an asshole after a rally when he thought a mic was turned off.  We've had about three or four of these incidents this year, if you include the primaries.

- Overall, the DNC Convention was a bust.  They did establish some new stars, and had some great moments, particularly for talk radio and television (O'Reilly vs. Moore, Hannity vs. Garafolo, Hannity vs. Franken), but ratings have dropped from 4 years ago despite Democrats insisting they had galvanized their base, Kerry's speech has been deemed from okay to bad by the media, and people still didn't know anymore about Kerry than they did last week.  I think the proverbial convention bounce will pass Kerry by.  We'll know for sure by Monday.

Meanwhile, I think because of the dismal effort put forth by the Democrats, this election just became Bush's to win.  Bush is a better speaker now than he was in 2000.  Bush is in a better position than he was in 2000.  Kerry left himself open, and Bush exposed some of them today.  Because it's in the last week of August, children will be back in school, which means more people will be watching.  And although I don't like the fact that Bush is trying to hold back on conservatives speaking at the convention, the fact remains that he has an all-star cast.

Bush's only problem?  Protesters.  They are going to try to make New York a living hell.  Don't be surprised to hear about terrorist threats, and anarchy during the convention.

Posted at 08:43 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home




Thursday, July 29, 2004
Stanley Crouch ain't no punk!

Man I was still musing over my comments last night about Sharpton, trying to figure out how I could clip and cut it to make a pretty decent column.  (By the way, thanks to Booker for linking it.  I need to step up my blog game any way I can.)

But then, this pops up and I damn near forgot about it....and it had me almost in tears.

That is the funniest column I've read in a while.  Now, I don't know that much about Stanley Crouch, other than he's supposedly a conservative and he rails against hip hop and civil rights pimps.

But a punk he's not, at least according to Ta-Nehisi Coates.  In fact, Crouch has a tendency to get caught up in heated arguments, and he lets his temper get the best of him.

Check it:

On July 12, out for lunch at Tartine in the West Village, Crouch spotted Peck, who'd trashed his book Don't the Moon Look Lonesome a few years back. After greeting Peck with one hand, Crouch smacked him with the other. "What I would actually have preferred to happen," says Crouch, "was that I had the presence of mind to hawk up a huge oyster and spit it in his face."

Crouch claims he recieved several calls thanking him for the act, which wouldn't be a surprise given that Peck made his name by penning extended negative and, often personal, reviews of other fiction writers.
Now that's just fucked up, folks.  At least give ole boy a warning, or a mean mug, or something.  You gon SNEAK him, Stan?  That's just wrong.  That's dirty. 

And the simple fact that Crouch SLAPPED that kat speaks volumes, too.  Getting punched is bad.  But to get slapped...by another man?  That's just total disrespect.  That's saying "You aren't worthy of getting knocked out, so I'mma pimp slap you like Dolemite would do one of his hoes."  C'MON STAN!!!

But this....THIS...is what takes the cake, tho:

There was the time Crouch was arguing with jazz writer Russ Musto and told him that if he were a foot taller he'd knock his block off. Musto kept arguing, since he knew he wasn't growing any. Crouch went back on his word, and swung at him anyway. After the two men were separated, Crouch calmed down and offered to buy Musto a drink. Musto says they're friends to this day.

Then there's what happened to Guy Trebay, whom Crouch stalked through the Voice's old offices threatening to kill him, relenting only after writer Hilton Als intervened. Another time, writer Harry Allen approached Crouch, hoping to exchange some notes on hip-hop. Instead Crouch, evidently in a bad mood, caught Allen's neck in the cobra clutch, prompting the Voice to give Crouch his walking papers.
Man, I ain't gonna lie to yall.  I'm STILL laughing at this shit and it's been an hour since I've read it.

You gonna clown a short dude, telling him you ain't gonna hit him because he's too short.....and then HIT him anyway.  Offer this kat a drink, and yall become friends.  If that ain't some schoolground shit, I dunno what is.

And it says alot about the Village Voice that it takes a Cobra Clutch (Coates knows his wrestling terminology, doesn't he?) to get Crouch fired.  He's threatened editors, interviewees musicians, etc...but you put someone in a cobra clutch, and that's crossing the line.  If Crouch acts like this, I can imagine how the rest of that paper acts.  It's probably Gangstas Heaven over there.  They should have thought twice about publishing this, because it makes them look just as bad as it does Crouch.

I think all white people need to keep this in mind, tho:

But never let it be said that he who purports to be a black male gives up the beast. That it's all an act, and he really won't kick your ass. That in the middle of politicking over Fitzgerald, Faulkner, and tea, he won't go David Banner, upturn your table of crumpets and coffee-cake, grab you by the collar, drag you out into the darkest alley, and show you that, yes, what you have heard is true. That he will not swing through on his dick and snatch your Jane on a vine like Tarzan. Never let it be said that Jim Brown was not the essence of him. Never let it be said that he—whether Crip or Crouch—failed to be a nigga.
Ditto.  And I ain't mad at him for doing that, at least on occasion.  Because as I said, sometimes people just think they can say whatever they want, ala Ted Rall, and think you're just gonna let them slide.  Sometimes you just gotta whup somebody's ass before you get some respect.

Now Crouch?  WAAAAAAAAYYYY over the line.  But this did provide me with a good laugh for a day or two, so I aint mad at him.

Posted at 01:02 pm by Expertise
Comments (2)  

Home

Let's take care of Al Sharpton real quick.

Before I start, lemme say that I have no personal grievances against Al Sharpton.  I, trying to get my foot in the door of broadcasting, which stresses excellent public speaking, have an appreciation for Sharpton's great public speaking skills.  And I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt that he means well.

But while he tore the roof off of the Fleet Center with his speech at the DNC Convention, he wasn't tearing anything up around here.  You see, Democrats are easily suckered in with these hustlers that are all talk and no substance.  When given a choice between substance and style, they will always choose style.

Don't believe me?  They nominated a man to be their presidential candidate simply because of the fact that he spent four months in Vietnam and was rewarded purple hearts, thinking that will stalemate the foreign policy issue of the incumbent president.  They nominated a one-term senator who wasn't even popular in his home state (I should know. I live here.) and won't even be able to deliver it to the Democrats in the presidential election simply because he's charismatic and good-looking.   For this and this alone they should be beaten by a landslide in this election.

But back to my point.  Sharpton can talk all that jive and get people in that convention all whooping and hollering, but then there comes a time where the things you say have to be analyzed and scrutinized.

This is where I come in.  Let's start it off in which Sharpton responded to Bush's comments to the Urban League last week (transcript courtesy of CNN:)

Mr. President, as I close, Mr. President, I heard you say Friday that you had questions for voters, particularly African- American voters. And you asked the question: Did the Democratic Party take us for granted? Well, I have raised questions. But let me answer your question.

You said the Republican Party was the party of Lincoln and Frederick Douglass. It is true that Mr. Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation, after which there was a commitment to give 40 acres and a mule.

That's where the argument, to this day, of reparations starts. We never got the 40 acres. We went all the way to Herbert Hoover, and we never got the 40 acres.

We didn't get the mule. So we decided we'd ride this donkey as far as it would take us.

Sharpton, as usual, dabs into revisionist history.  And it is quite disgusting too.  He disparages, knowingly or not, our ancestors that came before us, thinking they only supported the Republican Party for some corrupt, crooked scheme like reparations.

But hey; this is how black leftists have portrayed black people for years!  Begging for money and possessions from the white man, and since ONE side didn't give it to us, we'll just go on the other side and squeeze them for whatever they're worth.  You know, it's amazing at what depths they will go to try to rationalize such filth.

When I was a child, I was raised in Hyde County, North Carolina, one of the most rural and poorest counties in North Carolina.  There wasn't, and still isn't, a stoplight in the whole county.  It wasn't surprising to find someone who lived in a house that didn't have indoor plumbing.  But see, at that time I didn't even know what poor was, or I didn't realize what it was.  Why?  Because noone told me.  We were all in the same boat.  I thought because I had clothes on my back and food in my stomach and I was able to play with some toys and we had a car that I was okay. 

That was the 1980's.  Imagine what was going on in the 1930's, when Herbert Hoover was around.  Indoor plumbing, electricity, etc...was unheard of.  Most of them worked in the fields.  Everyone was trying to scrounge for what they could get.

But I tell you what:  what little they DID have, they were PROUD of it.  They had their own land.  The ones that could had their own fields.  They had their own schools.  They hunted and fished and grew what they ate at dinner that night.  And they NEVER had their palms out asking a white man for something they didn't earn.

When it was time to fight for their rights, they were there


When the KKK started spreading leaflets all over Engelhard, and defaced my uncle's barbershop, it was one black woman who picked them all up, went straight to the county Grand Dragon, threw those leaflets in his face, and said "Next time, use the mail." 

When they tried to close down our black schools, they marched from Swan Quarter to Raleigh.  They faced down police, faced down dogs, were battered, bruised, and arrested.  They felt so strongly about it and were so determined, that no black child went to school in Hyde County during the 1968-1969 school year.

When the KKK held a big rally in Middleton, and they shot at a car that had black teenagers in it that were passing by, it was my family, and our community, that took up arms and stood up to the KKK.  And they haven't been seen in Middleton or that county ever since.

For Al Sharpton to stand in Boston at that convention and talk about black people switching to the Democratic Party -  a party who at that time was CONSUMED by hate, bigotry, racism, oppression, and was at the FOREFRONT of white supremacy - because we didn't get "40 acres and a mule" insults not only my people, but the families and the ancestors of millions of black people.

These were people who had pride for who they were and what they had, and they weren't going to let anyone take it away from them.  Sharpton's sorry attempt to get a one-up on President Bush and the Republican Party is nothing more than rewriting history to advance your goals and your aspirations.  And I will NOT let him use the memories of not only my people, but millions others that lived during those times, to do so.

Al Sharpton and these other hustlers may go to these public appearances and give these grand speeches and have these naive, ignorant people get off their feet and applaud with vigor, but ignorance is still ignorance, no matter how good you sound saying it.

I think I've said enough.  Let's move on:

Mr. President, you said would we have more leverage if both parties got our votes, but we didn't come this far playing political games. It was those that earned our vote that got our vote. We got the Civil Rights Act under a Democrat. We got the Voting Rights Act under a Democrat. We got the right to organize under Democrats.

Mr. President, the reason we are fighting so hard, the reason we took Florida so seriously, is our right to vote wasn't gained because of our age. Our vote was soaked in the blood of martyrs, soaked in the blood of good men (inaudible) soaked in the blood of four little girls in Birmingham. This vote is sacred to us.
Al likes to decide what history he wants to remember at what time.  So let me finish the history lesson:

- It wasn't a Republican who stood in front of the doors at the University of Alabama.

- It wasn't Republicans who filibustered the Civil Rights Act in the Senate.

- It wasn't Republicans who set the dogs and the hoses on marchers in Birmingham and Selma.

- It wasn't Republicans who killed those four black girls when they bombed a Birmingham Church.

- It wasn't a Republican president who introduced segregation to the federal government.

- It WAS a Republican president who was in office when Brown v. Board of Ed was argued in front of the Supreme Court.

- It WAS a Republican president who first enforced that decision.
- There were a higher percentage of the Republican Party that passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 than the Democrats.

- It WAS a Republican Congress who passed the first 4 Civil Rights Acts.....in 1866, 1870, 1871, and 1875.

- It WAS a Republican, who appointed the only dissenting opinion in the Supreme Court that ruled the Civil Rights Act of 1875 unconstitutional.

- It WAS two Republican presidents who sought Booker Washington as an advisor during the late 1800's
But hey....why get into specifics, right?  I mean, this is the man who doesn't even know that the two men who created and helped passed the bill that helped protect and establish organized labor - the Taft-Hartley Act - were both Republicans.

If Al actually took Florida seriously, then he would have called for STATEWIDE recounts.  You know...so the black people that live in Northern Florida could make sure THEY had their votes counted?  Why didn't you call for Florida Democrats to end that lawsuit trying to get military absentee ballots thrown out, Al?  Black people DO join the military, too.  I'm sure my stepfather, who did 20 years of active military service would attest to that.

And while you're at it Al, why don't you talk to your brother Jesse, who was exposed when he went on a talk radio show when there was voting errors during their recall election.  When asked if then-Governor Gray Davis won the election, would he still file a lawsuit disputing the election on the basis of racial disenfrancisement the good Reverend plainly stated "NO".  I guess counting the vote only matters when the person he wants to win is elected.

Like I said, it's all about STYLE over SUBSTANCE for them.  It doesn't matter if you get the facts right, as long as you look good when you say it.  But to millions of people - black, white, or whatever - these things have a profound effect on how we look at the world and how we react to it.  One day I hope that Al and many others realize how powerful their words can be and how carefully they choose their words.  I doubt it, but it's always good to hope.

I'll have more about other thoughts about the DNC Convention by tomorrow afternoon.  I had to just get that out of my head.

Posted at 03:20 am by Expertise
Comments (6)  

Home

Major Kerry campaign fundraiser linked to mob.

Man, the hits keep on coming with these boys.

As Edwards was speaking at the DNC Convention tonight, and they were making John Kerry their official nominee soon afterwards, ABCNews broke a story exposing another fundraising problem for the Kerry campaign, making it the second campaign finance problem in less than a week and the third in a month.

First, a Kerry fundraiser collects money from the son of a disgraced South Korean president who was recently charged for failure to pay inheritance taxes.  I posted about that here.  Earlier this week, Edwards gave back over $44,000 in campaign contributions raised by a lawyer who's now being investigated by federal authorities over his fundraising tactics.

Now, Kerry's biggest fundraiser is connected to the mob.

Guys, you can't MAKE stuff like this up.

Stephen Bing, who's supposedly a successful film producer, and made headlines when he told the tabloids that he might not be the father of Elizabeth Hurley's baby, has raised over $16 million dollars for the Kerry campaign.

Well he has a friend and business partner named Dominic Montemarano aka Donnie Shacks.  Here's how Shacks was described:

"Donnie Shacks' main activity was murder. No question about it. That was his main function for the Colombo family and for organized crime in general. He was one of the top hit men in the New York area," said Joe Coffey, a former NYPD investigator.

That's nothing to play with.

Now Shacks's lawyer states he is an employee.  Some employee.  According to the Los Angeles Times, Bing paid Shacks's legal fees after his latest legal battle.  I'm sure you and I know plenty of bosses that pay for their employees' lawyers, especially when it is tied up in the mob.

Of course, ABC had to remind everyone that Republicans have had campaign finance problems, too:

Throwback to Nixon Days?

Campaign reform advocates say the role of secretive big money is all a throwback to the days of Richard Nixon and the scandal that grew out of the 1972 Republican Convention.

The telephone company that helped pay the costs of that convention, ITT, later got favorable consideration on an antitrust issue, when it became the world's largest conglomerate.

Yeah.  Bring up a campaign finance scandal from 32 years ago, as if that's the latest one you could bring up. 

As if you couldn't remember the FEC fining the Democratic Party over $700,000 for various campaign finance scandals stemming from Election 96, which is one of the reasons why people were yelling for campaign finance reform.  Here is also a great CNN report detailing the many Clinton-Gore campaign finance scandals investigated by the Justice Department and by Congress.

It's comforting to know that the Democrats haven't learned a thing from those scandals, huh?  Is this the party you want in the White House?

Posted at 01:07 am by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home




Wednesday, July 28, 2004
Computerized machines loses Florida 02 vote.

The New York Times reports that all of the electronic records from Election 02 have been lost in that voting paradise of Miami-Dade County.

You see, this is precisely what I expected.  People that were panicking because of the uproar of Election 2000 - problems that were normal occurrences in elections but was amplified because of how close it was - demanded "updated" machines using computerized technology.

But we NEED a paper trail.  That's the only way to know for sure how many votes there are and if one person actually voted.  You get some computer geek into that system to "tweak" it, and we'll have widespread problems.  At least with paper ballots we have solid visual proof of what people voted.  With computers you never know, because all the information are in microchips.

So I'll never be in favor of computerized voting, and I sure as hell would never support online voting either.

Posted at 04:41 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home

Tuesday's DNC Notes:

- Wow.  Ted was actually sober tonight.

His nephew:  "Uncle Ted, are you alright?  I don't smell Seagram's Gin on you."

- I missed the Howard Dean speech, as I was on my way home from work.  I'm sure I didn't miss anything.

- *sighs*  Ruby and Ossie should have stayed home, or at least got someone to read whatever was on that paper while they stood there and smiled.  Their speech was horrible.

- I guess this was black night.  I'm sure that's the last time you'll see black people speaking at the convention, other than Al.  Speaking of Al, I wonder if they gave him a prime time speech?  You know he'll tear the house down too.

- Moore vs. O'Reilly sucked.  Both of them are weak, but O'Reilly was more disappointing.  I wish Moore would have given Hannity that weak mess, because I know he would have knocked it out the ballpark.  Now I think Hannity is too much of a self-promoter, but he does not pull punches in debates.  Ask Ralph Nader, or Al Franken.

- Ron Reagan's speech was ABSOLUTELY pointless.  I was about to go to sleep on it.  Why they had him come behind Obama to kill the crowd off is one of those mysteries in life.  And check this out:  at the end, he told people to go to the polls and vote for stem cell research.  I didn't know it was going to be on the ballot.

- Kids for Kerry?  These little snot-nosed kids can't hardly read, yet they're supposed to help Kerry win an election?  This is just P-A-T-H-E-T-I-C.  You see how they had that little girl bashing Vice-President Cheney?  They used a KID to bash their opponents!  That is a crying ass shame, folks. 

That was a perfect example of why kids should be SEEN and not HEARD.

- Somebody must have put Teresa Kerry-Heinz back on her prozac again.  And the very NEXT time I see a two-bit reporter or political analyst call her sexy or gorgeous (as some blonde dope did on Aaron Brown's NewsNight) I swear I'mma throw a rock into my TV.

- And finally, Obama himself.  I'm sorry folks, but I don't give ANY National Democrat the benefit of the doubt (in Georgia?  Yeah.  NC?  Maybe.  Washington?  No.).  I'm sure Obama has a nice smile.  He definitely has good b.s.  But I'm not a black conservative simply because I oppose the black establishment or current black political figures.  It's because I believe in conservative ideals.  So with that said, Obama is no different than the rest of them.

I've said this before, and I'll say it again, the first black president won't be a Democrat.  He'll be a Republican/Conservative.  America is apprehensive about electing white leftists, so what you think they're going to do when they get a black one?  He claims he's not ashamed to call himself a "liberal"  (I call him a leftist.  Calling them "liberal" implies they believe in liberty, which they don't.).  We'll see once he goes through that Senate ringer and then has to run for reelection.

Don't believe me?  Well think about it:  there's a good reason why the top black political figures are linked to the Republican Party:  C. Powell, Rice, M. Powell, Thomas, Paige and a year or two back, Watts.  It's because the black establishment are so partisan and consist of a bunch of party hacks that veer to the far left of the political spectrum.  They claim Obama represents a new generation of black leadership?  Yeah.  I'll believe it when I see it.  The only way he can be that is to denouce the left, and I don't see him doing that.  So he's just another phony-baloney-plastic-banana-good-time-rock-n-roller (c) Rush Limbaugh.

Posted at 05:32 am by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home




Next Page



   









Contact Me

If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:




rss feed

BLOGDRIVE
TEMPLATES

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

Blogdrive