A very good article by fellow blogger Robert Cox, who writes about how conservatives are losing the battle for the internet to the lunatic leftist fringe.

At various blogging conferences since, I have had the opportunity to observe many of these bright minds strategizing on how to best leverage the emerging world of blogs and other "social networking" services known as "Web 2.0" to advance their liberal political agenda and win elections.

Their common refrain: "We need to own the Internet the way the right owns talk radio."

They got me wondering whether the online "conservative elite" was aware of what the left had in mind and, if so, whether they were concerned. During the past few years, I have had the opportunity to ask this of Internet specialists working on the Bush-Cheney campaign, top officials in the Republican National Committee, communications specialists at the White House and dozens of top conservative bloggers.

A-List blogger and talk radio show host Hugh Hewitt's response was typical: "It doesn't matter who creates the tools used by bloggers, but what bloggers do with those tools."

When I suggested that ceding control of the major "nodes" in the online world to the left was a huge mistake, they were dismissive. It became clear they could not imagine one day finding themselves boxed out of what is fast becoming the biggest force in electoral politics.

First, I don't think you can actually say that conservatives are being "boxed out" of the political process.  Yes; over the last 3-4 years, the left - through the vessels of MoveOn.org, the blogs, and the money of the multi-millionaires - have created a machine that threatens to shift the balance of power to a Democratic Party that is becoming more radical and more socialist as the days go by. 

While the results of the upcoming mid-term elections could change this fact, conservative bloggers and talk radio still have the upper hand.  Never has the media been dogged by watchdogs of this magnitude, and it's only going to get worse.  As long as blogs like Powerline, Little Green Footballs, Michelle Malkin and others are ready and willing to do key investigative work exposing the biased reporting of the mainstream media as they have done since Election 2004 to the Israeli-Lebanon conflict, they will continue to have an impact in the political arena.

But should conservatives come out in force to help Republican candidates campaign and get elected?  In my opinion, the jury is out on that one.  Groups like Rightroots, RedState.com, and, to an extent, the Club for Growth are trying to do that.  However, a good number of the conservative bloggers aren't part of the Republican rank and file, even if they are even registered.  In fact, conservative bloggers, through Porkbusters, an organization committed to cutting pork-barrel spending in Congress, has went after some of the top Republicans in Congress, and has expressed dissatisfaction over runaway spending in Congress by the Republican Party.  With the exception of Joe Lieberman, leftist bloggers have not been willing to go after the Democrats in the same manner.

Cox insists the failure of conservatives to venture further into creating a poltiical machine is a mistake, as he highlights what happened to Michelle Malkin this week:
Now this is where the left's influence on the internet becomes a problem.  It took years before Fox News penetrated television news with views from the other side of the political spectrum.  Conservatives can not allow the same thing to happen with the internet.  With Google, a company that has had no love or respect for conservative viewpoints (nor for viewpoints of freedom, for that matter), recently acquiring YouTube for $1.65 billion dollars, it doesn't look as if anything will change.   Google as well as the left side of the political spectrum only cares about the freedom of their speech; any other viewpoints don't matter and can and should be silenced at any time.

With Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft being the centers of traffic on the internet - particularly within the realm of video blogging - conservatives suddenly find themselves behind the 8-ball.  Several leftists have taken advantage of YouTube in order to get some of the most vile and disgusting Bush and Republican-bashing videos out to millions.  While Malkin's Hot Air does have the potential to become a key force within the blogosphere and the internet, a lot more needs to be done in order for that to happen.  There are opportunities out there for conservatives to get the message out, and they need to be taken advantage of.

It's been a while since I've talked about football, so here goes:

- First, the Panthers.  Last time I posted my thoughts on football, the Panthers were 0-2.  Now they're 3-2.  Facing the Bucs and the Browns helped a lot, but a big win against the then-undefeated Saints, who beat Atlanta the week before, helped too.  While Steve Smith statistically hasn't made that big of a difference, the deep threat that he brings to the Panthers' offense opens things up for both Keyshawn Johnson to get some nice catches and also for Deshaun Foster to open up the running game.

Foster has been the biggest surprise in the last couple of weeks.  Against Minnesota, he ran for 26 yards on 13 carries.  But since Smith's return, he ran for 82 yards against the Bucs, 106 yards against the Saints and 105 against the Browns.  While I will say I didn't think he'd have much of an impact this year, and DeAngelo Williams would eventually get the starting nod (although now he has a sprained ankle...how ironic),  I am surprised at this sudden burst of production.

Carolina has its biggest test yet, as they travel to Baltimore to face the Ravens.  This won't be pretty by any stretch of the imagination.  This will be the toughest defense the Panthers face this year and there's no question that the matchup in the trenches has to be Julius Peppers vs. Jonathan Ogden.  If Ogden wins, that means McNair has time to get the football off, and more than likely the Ravens will win.  If Peppers can get to him, however, the Panthers have a chance to win this game.  Either way, I don't expect either team to score more than 17 pts, if that much.

- Is it me, or has sports broadcasting as a whole has taken a turn for the worse?  It's bad enough that ESPN can't concentrate on one story at a time, and pushing it until you're ready to hurl, but Fox Sports is getting bad as well.

Sunday evening's Eagles/Cowboys game was a shining example of that.  Nevermind the fact that Drew Bledsoe threw three picks - one returned for a 101 yd TD - and fumbled twice.  No; the reason Dallas lost was due to Terrell Owens not having a good day, and thus it was his fault that the Cowboys lost.  Last time I checked, you needed a decent quarterback to get it to the receiver.

- Todd Sauerbrun was once considered the NFL's best punter.  Now he's been cut from the Denver Broncos after coming off of a suspension for using ephedra.

Two things:  1.  Ephedra shouldn't be banned.  2.  Sauerbrun had no business taking it anyway.  Even Shanahan stated he didn't care if Sauerbrun was 300 llbs, as long as he could punt the ball like a mule.  I think this stemmed from Fox giving Sauerbrun so much hell for being overweight while he played for the Panthers.

- I understand the logic of football fans not thinking the Colts and the Chargers are not the two best teams in the league.  After all, Schottenheimer and Dungy have  coached some great teams, but neither have made it to the big game.  But there's no question in my mind that the Chargers are the most talented team in the league, and until someone beats Indy, they're at the top of the pecking order.

- Did anyone notice that the Rams are 4-1?  I didn't either.  It helps when you have to play three teams that have a total of two wins so far this season.  We'll see what they'll do this week vs. Seattle.

- Who's my frontrunner for MVP?  After last week, I don't see how anyone can say anybody but Donovan McNabb.  Not only is McNabb putting up great numbers (and to the guys that have him on your fantasy team, I hate you all), but he's doing it with no running game and considerably lesser talent at WR.

- Speaking of McNabb, I can't recall a season where there have been so many high school and college style offensive calls made than this year.  McNabb's trademark has been the 40 yard fleaflicker bomb.  Sometimes I think he tells Stallworth and Lewis in the huddle, "Just go deep; I'll get it to you".  But hey; it works.  Atlanta's trying to run an option offense straight out of a high school playbook.  You don't hardly see that in college, yet they're trying to run it in the NFL.  On Sunday night, Pittsburgh tried a WR reverse on 4th and 6.  That didn't even come close to working.  Some of these coaches are going to get bit in the ass while trying some of these sandlot plays.

- Pittsburgh looks like they are going down the same route the Tampa Bay Bucs did a few years ago.  Tampa Bay won the Super Bowl, looked impressive in beating Philly in Week 1 the next season, and didn't make the playoffs.  Pittsburgh came off of a Super Bowl win, beat Miami in Week 1, but has lost their last 3.  And note; the AFC North has both 4-1 Baltimore and 3-1 Cincinnati.  It's going to be an uphill battle for Pittsburgh for most of the year.

- Key games next week:  Eagles/Saints, Rams/Seahawks (for the NFC West lead), Carolina/Baltimore, Giants/Atlanta.

...because this will make or break your reputation, and possibly your website.

Regardless, the evidence shows there was a bit of foul play, whether if this is true or not.

The first thing the Democrats will scream is "KARL ROVE".

After initially claiming he had an allergic reaction to painkillers, we find out that he did have an allergic reaction....to 30 of them.

Screw football.  I hope T.O. really gets help, and fast.

UPDATE:  ESPN has caught up with the local Dallas media, and they said that Owens was even trying to swallow pills as medical personnel arrived on the scene.

And you wanna know what spin is?  Check this out:

On Tuesday, Etheridge said of the incident: "This is not serious."

Probably like this:

"Where you at, 85?"

"I don't know"

Heh.

    - The Panthers are 0-2.  I wouldn't be as concerned about Sunday's loss if it wasn't one that was completely blown.  Make no mistake about it:  the Panthers had no business losing to the Vikings.  At all.  And we can thank Chris Gamble for it.

The mind-numbing lateral off of a punt return was the highlight, but ended up being an overall bad effort on the day for Gamble.  And it wasn't just him either; Foster never got his ypc over 2.5, and the offensive line was unprepared for the Vikings' blitz packages on third down.  If it hadn't been for Delhomme actually able to get rid of the ball a couple of times and took the sack, it would have been a worse situation than what it was.

Meanwhile, Carolina's problems in game and clock management (probably the worst I've seen in the John Fox era) overshadowed Julius Peppers's amazing defensive performance:  8 tackles, 3 sacks, and no telling how many hurries he placed on Brad Johnson (who, for his age, is damned good in his own right).  How could anyone say Peppers is not the best defensive lineman in the NFL today?  There's no question that he'll make it to the Pro Bowl, injuries aside.

But the rest of the team let Peppers down.  He might not say it, but I will.  It looked like nobody else on that team was trying to win a football game out there, and that's uncharacteristic of a Panthers' football team in the John Fox era.  I know there's plenty of football to go, but the Panthers need to get on the ball and it's got to start this week against Tampa Bay.

     - After the Giants played the Colts in the Manning Bowl in Week 1, I picked them to be the favorites to win the NFC East.  It's early, but I don't see how you couldn't pick them as the favorites right now.

Eli Manning led the Giants to a come from behind overtime victory this week.  They were down 24-7, and won 30-24 over the Iggles.  If you didn't believe it before, Eli is for real, and the Giants could go deep into the playoffs if they can continue to play this kind of football.  They're one of the most balanced teams in the league on both sides of the football.

    - I was kind of irked by Fox's coverage, because although the Panthers take precedence in NC - and rightfully so - they should have went over to the overtime coverage after the game.  I don't understand why the Giants/Iggles game wasn't the national broadcast this week, instead of regional.  And if people actually watched rodeos on television, you'd see them broadcast more often than they currently are.

    - Well, I guess the Steelers aren't looking so hot anymore?  Blanked by the Jaguars on Monday night, I'm sure people will say Rothlisberger came back too soon.  But how do you explain that 26 net yards rushing, though?  Even if you say the defense was able to concentrate on the run due to Big Ben's play, an 11 carries, 20 yard performance by Willie Parker won't cut it.  Do better, Willie.

And I told yall last week:  the Jags are for real this year.  They'll need to put up more than 9 points, but I think they're forgiven considering they beat the defending Super Bowl Champs.

    - If you've been watching NFL Network lately, you'd think Chad Johnson had bought it and made himself the main attraction.  He's on there for every other commercial break and on several of their original shows too.  However, the Simon Phoenix lookalike has had a lackluster start, failing to get over 80 yards in his first two games and one touchdown.  He got drilled in the hit of the week against the Browns.  Oh, and his first TD dance of the week was lame.

    - Detroit will be a better team than they were last year.  However, Roy Williams needs to do less talking and more playing.  Getting humbled by the Bears after guaranteeing a win was not a good look.

    - Everyone's calling the NFC East the best division in the league, but I digress.  It's actually the AFC North.  The Super Bowl Champions, along with the Bengals, who won the AFC East last year, and then you have the resurging Ravens.  Those are three tough teams that I wouldn't want to play right now (and the Panthers have to play the whole division this year).

    - Key games this week:  Chicago/Minnesota (for the NFC North lead); Cincinnati/Pittsburgh (will the Steelers lose 2 in a row?); Jacksonville/Indy (AFC South lead and possibly to see who's the best in the AFC right now); Giants/Seattle.

    - Could someone tell me why ABC scheduled Atlanta/New Orleans as the Monday Night Game?  Plan to hit the bed early.

No, I haven't forgotten:  it's football season.

    - First, let's get the Panthers out of the way.  Am I panicking because the Panthers were thoroughly dominated by the Falcons?  No.

Why not?  It's several reasons.  First, just like last season, anytime the Panthers lost to someone they hyped the team that beat them and always made the Panthers seem like they were on their way out of the playoffs.  Carolina lost to the Saints in their opener last year, and everyone talked about how the Saints are playing on emotion, and they're going to get something done this year.  The Saints only won 2 more games the rest of the year.  When Carolina lost to Chicago midseason, everyone thought Chicago was the new favorite to go to the Super Bowl in the NFC.  Carolina faces them again at Soldier Field in the playoffs, and Steve Smith makes mincemeat of them.

Second, Atlanta is Atlanta.  Fox knows the score; if you don't stop the run, you're not going to beat Atlanta.  If you stop the run, you blow them out.  Although the acquisition of John Abraham definitely made for a better Falcons' pass rush, this is the same team that's been doing the same things for the last 3-4 years.  Vick only passed for 140 yards, and his completion percentage was still under 50%, even though he's got Lielie, Crumpler, Dunn on the flats, and White.  That offense, once again, will be tested again this year, and if they don't create a balanced attack, they will not only miss the playoffs, but they can look forward to Vick quitting again at the end of the season.

Now, am I worried?  Yeah, because we didn't show any semblance of a running game during Week 1, or in preseason.  I felt paying Foster that money was a mistake; not only because he's an injury-prone running back, but he didn't show much after he was given the starting job last year.  He had a couple of good playoff games, but he didn't show anything in the regular season.  If Foster isn't averaging a good 4.5 ypc, then the running game becomes a liability, and makes the team one-dimensional.  DeAngelo Williams shows promise, but he's not ready to start.

I expected more from not only Foster, but Keyshawn Johnson, and that offensive line.  John Fox makes some of the best adjustments of any coach in the NFL, so we'll see what look he brings to Minnesota on Sunday.

    - If you want to know why the National Football League is the top professional sport in America, all you have to do is look at the marquee games on Week 1:  a solid matchup on Thursday with Pittsburgh beating Miami; the "Manning Bowl", which saw the brother tandem showing why both teams are Super Bowl contenders this year;  and then the September 11th double-header, with a tight Redskins/Vikings game and Phillip Rivers debuting as the Chargers shut out the terrible Raiders.  Even the Chargers/Raiders game was still fascinating to watch for a lot of reasons.

    - Does the Deion Branch acquisition make the Seahawks the favorite in the NFC again?  I don't know.  But looking at that terrible game against the Lions, where they won 9-6, they definitely need him to help create a spark.

    - The Jags only made the playoffs last year because they happened to have an easy schedule down the stretch.  Having said that, they are a solid team this year, and will give the Colts problems in the AFC South.

    - Are the Ravens for real?  it's hard to argue with that 27-0 buttwhupping placed on the Bucs.  For their sake, I hope so, because both Brian Billick and Steve McNair's fates are controlled by each other.  If they don't make it to the playoffs, Billick won't have a job and McNair might not start for another team.

    - Phillip Rivers was placed in the best position that a quarterback could ask for:  the league's best running back in the backfield, and the league's best tight end on the line.  Then he has a solid veteran to throw to in Keenan McCardell, a solid defensive line, and a decent coach in Marty Schottenheimer.  Now that I think about it, SD had no business not making it to the playoffs last year; I don't care if they had Aaron Brooks at quarterback.

    - Speaking of Aaron Brooks...it's a dead heat between him and Bret Farve for early voting of the worst starting quarterback of the year.  I'm sure Al Davis had to love that 42 net passing yards his new quarterback got him.  Here's a hint:  unless it's Duce McAllister, you're not going to get too many valuable players from the Saints.

    - J.P. Losman, watch the lines.  A safety in the fourth quarter won't help garner confidence in your ability to lead the Bills as a playoff threat.  When you have a chance to beat the Pats, you have to make good on it.

    - I'm still not sold on Cincinnati.  Maybe it's because I haven't seen enough of them this year, but I think I want to see more out of Rudy Johnson and the running game as well as that defense before I can say they're one of the top teams in the league.  Consecutive games against Pittsburgh and New England at the end of this month will probably do the trick.

    - The best game of the week:  San Francisco falls to Arizona.  Who would have ever thought that would be as entertaining as it was?  With Jim Haslett unveiling an improved Rams defense, Norv Turner working with Alex Smith at the Niners, and Edgerrin James bringing needed depth for Arizona, the NFC West will be much tougher, and more competitive than it has been in years.

    - I only have two picks for the hot seat:  Brian Billick, who better hope Steve McNair can stay healthy, and Jon Gruden, who might be out by midseason if the Bucs continue to play like they did on Sunday.  I would add Art Shell, but would Al Davis ditch him after one year again?  Who knows.

    - This year, I'm in two fantasy football leagues and in a 25-man football pool.  I went 1-1 in my leagues, and I'm tied for 17 after week one in pickem.  My picks were 9-7.  Ugh.  Week 1 tends to be my worst week, anyway.

More football to come later.

tonight on WPTF and tomorrow morning on 850 The Buzz.

NC State loses 20-17....to AKRON?  AT HOME?????

And straight up:  he'll deserve every single bit of it.  NC State was talking about having a chance to get a ACC title game berth.  Now they'll be happy if they can salvage a bowl game from this season.

NC State's defense was absolutely pathetic, especially on that winning Akron drive, which saw them put it in the endzone on the last play of the game.  They should have simply stepped aside and let them score; at least they would have had a chance for a last drive, rather than Akron sucking up the rest of the clock. 

And what in the HELL was State thinking when they called an option on 4th and 1 inside the 5???  They were in the lead by a field goal at that time....why didn't they kick the field goal?  Or at the very least, if you're going to go for it, punch it up the middle??  There's no excuse for that play AT ALL.  You're in a tight game in the 4th quarter, you take the points.

I agreed with the Buzz guys a few weeks ago that the catcalls from the peanut gallery that Amato should go were premature, and he's doing a relatively decent job at State.  However, this loss to Akron will make even more noise, and if Amato is run out of Raleigh as unceremoniously as Herb Sendek was in backetball, people will point to today's loss, and how terrible every fascet of the game was; offense, defense, and coaching.

But as a Carolina fan, and despite seeing my Tarheels get smoked by Va Tech today, I revel in it.

It sure sounds like it.

According to a new article by the Associated Press, the officer that shot San Diego Chargers linebacker Steve Foley was off-duty, in civilian clothes, followed Foley all the way home from off the interstate, and Foley was unarmed.

Here's more:

"To my knowledge, I don't believe Foley did have a weapon, even though I was told he reached into his waistband with his right hand," said San Diego County sheriff's Lt. Dennis Brugos.

According to the Sheriff"s Department's initial report Sunday, Foley was shot after he reached into his pants with his right hand while approaching the policeman, who was in civilian clothes and driving his own car.

[Officer Aaron] Mansker has been placed on paid administrative leave, said Leah Corbin, a police spokeswoman in Coronado, a wealthy peninsular enclave across the bay from downtown San Diego. She declined to release any other details about the officer.

According to official reports, Mansker noticed a car swerving on the freeway while driving at speeds of 90mph and almost collided with several cars.  He decided to follow the car, thought to be Foley, which had stopped at three lights on the way to the residence.  Mansker had ordered Foley to pull over before the shooting incident, but Foley ignored it.

It's not even known if Mansker even showed Foley his badge, and considering that he was behind some bushes when he confronted Foley and his girlfriend (who promptly tried to run him over), he more than likely didn't.

But even if he did, it's irrelevant.  We're talking about an officer that was off-duty and out of uniform trying to pull someone over on a traffic violation.  When the person didn't comply, the officer then followed him to his residence, which resulted in an altercation and the driver being shot.  And note:  all of this is happening in the middle of the night in a large city.  If I see a person that is off-duty, and in civilian clothes trying to get me to pull over, I would think I'm about to be carjacked.

Why didn't Mansker call headquarters for backup and allowed them to make the proper arrest?  An off-duty cop is precisely that:  off-duty.  Particularly since troopers are often required to be in proper uniform and go through proper protocol when pulling over vehicles, you'd think cops would be careful about getting in altercations off-duty and out of uniform.

If the AP's article is accurate, and we aren't missing anything significant, I'd say that Foley has a good chance of winning a multi-million dollar lawsuit against the City of San Diego and against Aaron Mansker.  Mansker's handling of this incident was over the top, and he should have called for backup instead of trying to handle it himself.  This resulted in an incident that 1. possibly could have been avoided  2.  resulted in Foley getting shot, and almost got Mansker ran over  3.  will cost Foley the entire NFL season, and will make every team think twice before they pick him up....if a team will ever take him again.  The loss of the season, along with the time taken for rehab, and the public airing of this incident could end Foley's career.

I normally give the cops the benefit of the doubt, but not in this case.

If Republican congressional candidates want to know how to get back on the ball despite the odds being against them, they shouldn't look no further than Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum, who essentially made his opponent, Bob Casey, look lost and not even close to being on his level.

The debate, which aired on Meet the Press, was simply a breath of fresh air.  Santorum proved why he is one of the best senators in America, bar none.  Santorum was considered to surely lose this election, as Casey once led Santorum by as much as 15 points in the Rasmussen and Quinnipac polls, which his support hovering around only 35%.  Just after Memorial Day, Santorum trailed in the Rasmussen poll by 23 points.

However, he's fought back, and now Quinnipac has him behind by a 6-point margin, and Rasmussen has him down by 8.  This past week hasn't been kind to Casey, starting with the quasi-endorsement given to Santorum by Democratic Gov. Ed Rendell.  After the Meet The Press debacle, I wouldn't be surprised to find that Santorum has made this race a toss-up, moving the race into the margin of error.

On MTP, Russert threw everything but the kitchen sink at Santorum, but Santorum batted it right back.  He was a little defensive at first, but Santorum laid out his beliefs and was totally unapologetic for what he supports, and most importantly, who he supports. 

Here's a prime example of what I'm talking about (via transcript):

SEN. SANTORUM: What I would say is that we have found weapons of mass destruction, they were older weapons, but we have found chemical weapons. The report was just released not too long ago that, that said that there were over 500 chemical weapons found in Iraq.

MR. RUSSERT: Senator, the president has accepted the report of his two task force and said, "That the chief weapons inspector has issued his report. Iraq did not have the weapons our intelligence believed were there."

SEN. SANTORUM: Well, there were all sorts of weapons that our intelligence believed were there. They thought that they were new weapons. So far we, we did not—we have not found any new weapons. But we have found old weapons, weapons from the Iran/Iraq conflict, and we found over 500 and the report says that there were more.

This marks a key difference between Santorum and most of the congressional Republicans running for reelection.  Santorum did not back down from Russert's assertions; instead he confronted them with the facts.  I hope RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman was paying attention and taking notes, because this should become gospel to Republican candidates throughout the country:  stand your ground, and hit them with the facts.

Here's another one:

Do you believe you should have the same standard for President Bush? He should give a defined objective, he should give an exit strategy, he should give a cost, and he should give a timeline for Iraq, just as you were demanding President Clinton give for Kosovo?

SEN. SANTORUM: No. Because, because Kosovo and, and Slobodan Milosevic were never a security threat to the United State of America. No way. There—I mean, it wasn't even close.

MR. RUSSERT: But these are men and women at war.

SEN. SANTORUM: We had, we had—excuse me—we had no business, in my opinion—and I felt this today—we had no business going in—into that area.  We had no national security interest. We are up against an enemy that every single day in the streets of Iran they're out talking about how they want to destroy the United States, how they want to wipe Israel off the face of the earth.

Once again, this is one of those "gotcha" questions that Russert pulled on Santorum, and he adamantly defended his position and booted that right out of the park.  Once Russert pulled this card, Santorum became really passionate about what he believes in.

Meanwhile, Bob Casey came in and spouted the usual talking points from the DNC.  Here's Casey on fiscal responsibility:

MR. RUSSERT: Over 10 years.

MR. CASEY: Over 10 years, that's right.

MR. RUSSERT: Yeah, but, but if you rolled back the top 1 percent, it's about $56 billion in a year. Our deficit is 200...

MR. CASEY: That's true, Tim, absolutely.

MR. RUSSERT: How you going to balance the budget? Which, which programs you going to cut?

MR. CASEY: Tim, you can't, you can't balance a budget in one year. They've put us in such a fiscal hole, it will take many years. I hope it doesn't take 10 years, it took...

MR. RUSSERT: Well, but give me a couple ideas. Which programs would you cut?

MR. CASEY: Tim, there are a lot of things. I—in, in state government, I've already done this. Sometimes you, you try to limit the number of, of consultants, that's one idea. Sometimes you limit the size of, of, of the federal government. I've already done that in state government. There are a lot of ways. Especially some, some tax loopholes, off-shore tax loopholes that are in there right now.

There are lots of ways to cut. But the first thing you have to do, I think, is—and let me just outline these quickly. First of all, the tax cut. Over 10 years, if you repealed it for 200,000 and up, you could get $730 billion.  The second thing, on the estate tax, if we set the general estate tax exemption level at $3.5 million for an individual, 7 million for a couple, maybe even carve out a $5 million exemption for family farms and businesses, you could get a savings just on that alone of $300 billion over 10 years.  You're already at a trillion. It's a step along the way. A corporate welfare commission, over—conservatively over 10 years could get you 200 billion. And finally, you've got to make sure that we have a pay as you go strategy, just like a family has.

Out of that long, convoluted speech - which, ironically, Casey criticized Santorum twice during the debate for - there wasn't one thing within what he stated, that actually sounded anything like fiscal discipline.  Everything consisted of either repealing tax cuts, restoring taxes, closing loopholes, and raising revenue; none of which actually addresses the problem of runaway government spending.  I wished Santorum would have jumped on Casey about this; but his response was still good.

Casey had the nerve to attempt to criticize Santorum for his virtually unwavering support of President Bush and his policies, but it's very clear after Sunday morning that Casey will essentially be a clear supporter of the Senate Democratic leadership on an overwhelming majority of issues, if not more than Santorum's support of Bush.  It showed whether he was talking about abortion, or Social Security, or the debt.  At least Santorum supports a number of Bush policies because he actually believes in most of them, while Casey came off as another voice of the Democratic machine.

It's no wonder that Casey refused to have ten debates with Santorum (he did agree to four), as he got his clock cleaned on Sunday morning, and there isn't any reason for him not to get it again in the next debate.  I think there are some Democrats are starting to panick, because the Senate seat of one of their hated rivals thought months ago to possibly be a relatively easy pickup has possibly made this a neck-and-neck race that will be decided down the finish.