 |
|
Friday, November 18, 2005
"Boogie to Baghdad"
It's amazing what kinds of information goes completely under the radar.
From Byron York:
In case you don’t remember, “Boogie to Baghdad” is the phrase that Richard Clarke, when he was the top White House counterterrorism official during the Clinton administration, used to express his fear that if American forces pushed Osama bin Laden too hard at his hideout in Afghanistan, bin Laden might move to Iraq, where he could stay in the protection of Saddam Hussein.
Clarke’s opinion was based on intelligence indicating a number of contacts between al Qaeda and Iraq, including word that Saddam had offered bin Laden safe haven.
It’s all laid out in the Sept. 11 commission report. “Boogie to Baghdad” is on Page 134.
Amazing, ain't it? I wonder why this wasn't mentioned by the Washington Post? Did Bob Woodward tell Walter Pincus not to report this too?
Oh, and about that "safe haven" thing that York brings up (via CNN from 1999):
Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has offered asylum to bin Laden, who openly supports Iraq against the Western powers.
Do you know how many YEARS now I've been hearing leftists on television, radio, and the internet claim until they're blue in the face (no pun INITIALLY intended, but since it's there, I'll take it) that there has never been a connection between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda, even going to the extreme of saying the two were sworn enemies?
Why has CNN never recalled reporting these things when the Saddam and terrorism issue pops up? And they aren't the only ones to report this, as the London Observer, The Herald UK, National Public Radio, and Newsweek. If it wasn't for conservative voices like National Review, the Weekly Standard, and the logical side of the blogosphere, information like this would stay hidden from political discourse.
Posted at 03:20 am by Expertise
Link Me
Home
Thursday, November 17, 2005
University of Miami students/football players make rap track.
University of Miami students/football players make rap track.
Just when I thought things were getting a little boring:
A 2-year-old profanity-laced recording that denigrates women and minorities surfaced on the Web on Tuesday, putting the University of Miami's athletic department on the defensive about its image.
Miami's carefully cultivated image as a school well-past the days that earned it the reputation as a program lacking institutional control may have taken a blow when the rap song, which sources told ESPN.com includes the voices of several football players, surfaced on the Internet.
A group calling itself the 7th Floor Crew -- the name reportedly comes from the seventh floor of the Mahoney Residential College, campus housing at Miami -- made a recording referencing multiple acts of group sex, derogatory terms for women and minorities and dozens of curse words that lasts approximately 9 minutes. School officials say the song was recorded two years ago, but that seems to offer little solace.
Ha. What's ironic about this story is that most people wouldn't even know the track existed, but now they do, thanks to ESPN. If the Hurricanes' Athletic Department is on the defensive, it has no one to thank but ESPN.
Don't believe me? I ran a news check on both Yahoo and Google, and there were only two places where this was being reported: ESPN.com and the website Deadspin.com, who were the ones who outed a current University of Miami football player as one of the "artists" on the track (I won't bother saying his name, not because I want to protect him, but because I think he's going to get enough attention this morning).
Notice; the song is two years old. But how is it becoming a story now?
One word: snitch.
Kyle Munzenrieder outed at least one of them on his blog, Miamity.com. I say one because it's not for certain how many others have been outed because the post he initially created was deleted at the request of the UM Athletic Department. There is another post about it, where he's catching hell for what he's done. I don't know the guy, but if these football players get in trouble due to his outing, all I can say is I hope he watches his back.
Regardless, Deadspin.com picked up the story, and it somehow caught ESPN's attention, probably due to someone asking Hurricanes' wide receiver Sinorice Moss about it in an ESPN Chat session. Before you know it, ESPN had not only the initial story, but a column condemning the song and, being the moral voice of sports (yeah right), talked about how this sets such a low point for Miami football.
And note: the story and the column has barely been up for say, three hours while I'm writing this.
Here is the song.
Athletes - particularly football players - liking rap songs and wanted to make one? Say it isn't so! It's mysogynistic and vulgar? REALLY? I would have never guessed that football players would be interested in such a thing.
I think the real problem doesn't lie with these guys - after all, they are college students, and college students do stupid things - but with a media organization that decides to make news and then spin news rather than simply report it. But in that aspect, ESPN is simply following lockstep with the rest of the mainstream media.
Personally, it wasn't that bad, considering they were amateurs. It's definitely better than Laffy Taffy or some of the other garbage that hip hop stations are overplaying every hour. Just goes to show that anyone that has access to Adobe Audition and a couple of good beats can be a star. *shrugs*
Another Thing: ESPN claims that the fact that the song is two years old "seems to offer little solace". Solace to WHO? They are the first ones to report on this story outside of Deadspin and Miamity, with have site numbers that pale in comparison. Who how can someone have "little solace" when only a small group of people even KNEW about this rap before they reported it?
Posted at 02:57 am by Expertise
Link Me
Home
Wednesday, November 16, 2005
Maybe I should have talked about the Panthers' Cheerleaders.
Maybe I should have talked about the Panthers' Cheerleaders.
If it would have resulted in a boost like Wizbang got, I definitely should have.
'tis not fair.
Sorry, but I didn't find it that interesting. Chicks having sex in a bathroom? Ehh...if I wanted to see that, I'd simply buy some porn. *shrugs* And I don't think lesbians are a turn-on anyway. The only funny thing about that story is the fact that some broad got stomped for sticking her nose in that situation.
Yeah...I'm a prude. And I'm comfortable with that.
Posted at 10:52 am by Expertise
Link Me
Home
NFL Thoughts - Week 10
- I guess I can talk about my Panthers now. In the last three weeks, they've blown out the Sex Boaters, the Bucs, and the Jets. Not bad at all, considering they scored over 30 points on all three. But the real difference is that Julius Peppers decided to show up around Week 7. As noted on ESPN's Power Rankings, Peppers has had 5.5 sacks in the last four games. Before than? 0.
- Are the Panthers #1 in the NFC now? Nope. The Seahawks are. I'm still anticipating the Atlanta encounter on December 4th. Then we'll see where they stand from there. The Seahawks have a big game against the Giants on Thanksgiving Weekend, which will be pivotal in who gets a bye in the playoffs (I think both teams will make it).
- Hey Farve; thanks for showing up on Sunday. The Panthers appreciate it. For real.
- Hey Vick; thanks for those three fumbles on Sunday. While you're at it, thank that defense for giving up 33 points to the last place team in the worst division in the league.
The Panthers appreciate it. For real.
- This just in: Brooks Bollinger just threw another interception. In his sleep. Amazing.
- Eagles fans, look on the bright side: the NBA season is just starting, and the Sixers are looking pretty good right now. And if that don't help you, there's always hockey.
- The Bears are 6-3. Good, because it was looking as if the winner of the NFC North would have an 8-8 record for a minute. However, you can't blame folks for questioning the Bears' legitimacy when the best team they've played is 4-5 (Detroit).
They have Carolina and Tampa Bay in back-to-back games starting Sunday. Good luck.
- While I had on the Panthers game against the Jets, I was watching Tampa Bay/Washington. Great game, one that Washington had no business losing. Offsides on an extra point? C'mon guys. And that offense looked as if they had cashed it in during the last half of the 4th quarter.
- That 31-17 win the Broncos had against the Raiders looked like a pretty competitive game until you look at the box score and see that the Raiders scored all 17 points in the fourth quarter. Add that with ESPN releasing clips of Randy Moss's Sunday Conversation, and things are looking to good for Norv Turner. I'd probably look into some assistant coaching jobs, or do like Pete Carroll and Dave Wannestadt did and go back to college.
- The Jags probably have the easiest road to the playoffs from here on out. However, is anyone really confident that they'll make it? Considering the way that the Chargers and the Bengals are playing, ehh.
- Speaking of the Bengals: boys, air it out. Do not let Freeney turn Palmer into mincemeat, and more than likely you're not going to stop Manning/Harrison, thus, give everyone the football game they want to see and just keep lobbing it to Chad Johnson.
And note: this isn't simply because I want to see a shootout, but because I also wanna see what kind of endzone dance he does next.
- Hot seat candidates: Brian Billick (oh you are SO gone), Mike Sherman (Atlanta bending over at the Ga Dome wont save you), Mike Tice (don't worry, they're gonna put you on injured reserve after the season), Jim Haslett, Dennis Erickson, and, of course, Dom Capers.
I haven't done this in a while, so here's my Top 10:
1. Colts
2. Broncos
3. Steelers
4. Seahawks
5. Panthers
6. Bengals
7. Cowboys
8. Chargers
9. Giants
10. Bucs
Posted at 03:25 am by Expertise
Link Me
Home
Monday, November 14, 2005
R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero
1967-2005.
Former WWE Champion Eddie Guerrero was found dead Sunday morning in his hotel room.
According to Dave Meltzer, his nephew Chavo Guerrero called up to his room to see if he was up yet, and when he didn't get an answer, he got security to open the door. Guerrero was unconscious in the bathroom with a toothbrush in his mouth. It is believed that he suffered a heart attack while brushing his teeth, however, they have not disclosed his autopsy yet.
There have been several times I have questioned why I am a wrestling fan, but watching a Guerrero match will always refresh your memory. Eddie came through with a handful of guys (Dean Malenko, Chris Benoit, Rey Mysterio, Psychosis, Juventud Guerrera) that revolutionized the sport in so many ways. When they came on the scene in WCW, we were watching a new era for wrestling.
When Guerrero became WWE Champion, he was the smallest man to ever hold that title. He wrestled around 220 llbs, and is less than six feet tall. However, his athleticism and charisma was second to none. Nobody questioned whether he should be champion, and he would move on to main event Wrestlemania 20 and defeat Olympic wrestling gold medalist Kurt Angle in a great match. They closed the show with Guerrero and newly crowned World Heavyweight Champion Chris Benoit together in the ring.
As Guerrero noted after winning the WWE title, he had his demons. He had been a heavy drinker and druggie for a long time, climaxing into a near-fatal car crash, being fired from WWE, and a divorce with his wife, Vicki. Malenko, Benoit, and others talked to Jim Ross about placing Eddie in rehab, and they did. Eddie cleaned up his act, left the booze and drugs alone, and was living a clean life. On Meltzer's show last night, he noted that Guerrero had just passed his 4-year sobriety anniversary a few days ago. He had also bought a house for his family, in which he got back with his wife, Vicki. Eddie was one of the few who was very open about his problems, which was featured on a UPN special last year and also put on a special DVD.
This is a sad time for wrestling fans, as we lost a giant inside and outside of the ring.
UPDATE: Kevin Aylward has a great writeup at Wizbang.
Posted at 11:38 am by Expertise
Link Me
Home
Wednesday, November 09, 2005
Either pay him, or cut him.
Either pay him, or cut him.
I haven't said much about the Eagles/Terrell Owens controversy, mainly because I had said enough here and nothing's really changed since then (other than the fact that Hugh Douglas got his ass whupped, and probably deserved it for sticking his nose into another man's business, especially when he isn't even on the roster now).
Now, T.O.'s days with the Eagles are pretty much over, as it seems Reid and Laurie have had enough of his antics and have decided to put him on the shelf. They used a new character suspension rule that lasts up to four games, then they will deactivate him for the rest of the season.
There's one problem with that tho: they can't do that. Or at the very least, they shouldn't be allowed to.
I agree with Gene Upshaw and the NFL Players' Union, at least to an extent. You can't impose a suspension just so you can go without paying him. If you don't want him on your team anymore, cut him and let him go to a team that wants him. If you're not going to do that, then you need to finish paying him for the rest of the season. It's as simple as that. There's a contract, and you need to pay him in accordance to that contract.
No matter how people feel about Owen's conduct, the Eagles have no right from preventing him from making money, or continuing to conduct business. Football is his business. By keeping Owens from playing, Rosenhaus (Owen's agent) can't start negotiating to play for other teams. The union is calling for the Eagles to cut Owens immediately; but I say they could change him to deactivation status and pay him his full salary for the rest of the year, just like the Tampa Bay Bucs did to Keyshawn Johnson. But they can't suspend him, and THEN deactivate him, because Owens is entitled to get paid according to his contract. And that's reasonable considering these minor offenses.
After all, Owens wasn't accused of murder. He didn't rape some white chick. He didn't beat his wife. He didn't get convicted of selling drugs. All he did was do what he always has done, and that's be a pain in the ass. That's what Owens did before he went to the Eagles, and it didn't take Nostradamus to prophetize that he was going to eventually do it with the Eagles. That doesn't mean the Eagles have a legitimate reason to not pay the man. They got themselves into this situation as much as Owens did. Call the season a loss, pay him, and be done with it.
Posted at 04:24 pm by Expertise
Link Me
Home
Election analysis.
If you didn't know, there was an election yesterday. Don't feel bad if you didn't, because I didn't remember it until, say, 11:00 last night. There wasn't anyone for me to vote for anyway. *shrugs*
But anyway, if you allow the other pundits to tell it, you'd initially think the Republicans lost both houses of Congress and the presidency. However, these were all state elections, and didn't have anything to do with the people's like or dislike for the president or Congress. They'll have their chance to voice their frustration next year.
To claim that Schwarzenegger lost on his initiatives battle and the governorships in New Jersey and Virginia show how dissatisfied America is with the GOP is stretching things a bit much. Both governors races currently have Democrats sitting in them, as New Jersey state politics has always been dominated by Democrats and Virginia had a pretty popular Democratic governor that will step down due to term limits this year. Corzine is stepping down as a U.S. Senator to take the governor's office. Those were high profile races, especially since those were the only two taking the national stage this year. It's more of a testament about what kind of campaign they ran than it is a referendum on national politics.
And both campaigns were quite dirty. Doug Forrester, who ran on the GOP ticket in NJ, decided he would dab into Corzine's private life by featuring his ex-wife in a television ad, saying he let his family down, and thus he would let New Jersey down as well. She also made accused Corzine of making deals with county officials across the state in order to get their support when he ran for senator. There is no other way to spin it; Forrester should have never allowed Corzine's ex-wife to get involved nor should he have tried to open up Corzine's private life for the state to see. It only compounded things when Forrester promised not to use her in the campaign a day before the ad started to run.
Kilgore ran a comparatively negative campaign, in which he mostly criticized Kaine and the Democratic leadership, and never highlighted any other topics than illegal immigration and the death penalty. Most of the comments about the Virginia race that I've seen has noted that it was one of the nastiest races in Virginia history.
Democrats are particularly proud of the Kaine win, as it is in a state Bush won in both 2000 and 2004. But there's a problem with that as well. For example, I live in North Carolina. In 2004, Bush took North Carolina relatively easy, and that's with the Democrats' Vice Presidential candidate being a senator from NC. Also, Gov. Mike Easley won reelection so easily that he could have slept through the whole campaign and won it, due to the terrible candidate the Republicans nominated. National politics is one thing, but state politics is a whole different breed of animal.
While Kaine won, what Democrats or the media won't tell you is that a Republican won the Lt. Governor's race. Thus, it wasn't as if the Democrats swept anything.
As for Schwarzenegger, I would have a "Come to Jesus" meeting with his political analysts, if I were him, and would probably get rid of a few of them. Everything about this yelled "BAD IDEA" from the start.
The whole idea of running another special election, when there were numbers of voters still weary of the last one, was dumb and contradictory. Schwarzenegger claimed he wanted to curb state spending, but then wastes millions of dollars on an election which was guaranteed to have a low turnout. I understood these propositions were important, but those should have been on the agenda in 2004 or 2006, not 2005.
Considering the L.A. Times did everything they could to try to defeat Schwarzenegger when he ran during the recall election, and is still smarting from the criticism it received for it's coverage of that election from readers and pundits alike, was there any doubt they would report that this was the costliest special election in California history every time they got a chance? Schwarzenegger played right into their hands, as well as the other newspapers on the Left Coast.
That wasn't the only contradictory issue, as on one hand Schwarzenegger wanted to curb spending and government power (spending cap, redistricting) and on the other hand wanted to strengthen it. First, two initiatives on the ballot would have allowed prescription drug plans that pigeonholed drug companies into paying the rates the state wanted them to. Second, an initiative would have placed even stricter regulation on electric providers, and would have made it harder for customers to change electric providers.
Yeah; great way to communicate to the public: "Vote for this proposition so we can take more options away from you and keep you from choosing the most affordable electric provider possible". Was it a mere coincidence that this proposition lost by the greatest margin? Didn't think so.
Posted at 12:56 pm by Expertise
Link Me
Home
Friday, November 04, 2005
Another thing I noticed (Milloy vs. Howard spinoff)
Another thing I noticed (Milloy vs. Howard spinoff)
I just happened to check my blog before I went to bed, and I remembered this passage from the letter that Howard President H. Patrick Swygert wrote on Monday (which I talked about in the Milloy/Howard controversy yesterday):
Our students are extremely aware and continue, in the finest tradition of the University, to be at the forefront in the quest for social justice and equality for our community. In recent times, for example, they led the march to the Supreme Court in support of the University of Michigan in Grutter vs. Bollinger.
Stop right there for a second and think about this: is this REALLY something to be proud of?
Look at it from the perspective of an HBCU. Howard is an overwhelmingly black school; hell, one of the most prestigious black schools in the country...yet you're marching in support for programs that will not only take good black students away from your institution in favor of majority white institutions, but will also keep black students out of your institution at the expense of letting white students in.
Race preference initatives work both ways, yanno. At a HBCU, programs are being set up that will allow other races to have an advantage when applying for schools at the expense of the majority race.
Now I think Howard is a private school, but a lot of HBCUs aren't. And these programs are being implemented.
Don't believe me? Ask Alabama State (upheld by the same federal district judge who threw out Georgia's Voter ID law, no less).
Thus, Howard was marching in favor of something that would hurt their bottom line, not help. That is, unless they feel more white students and less black students at Howard is actually a good thing.
I wouldn't be so eager to run around telling people this, if I were them.
Posted at 02:36 am by Expertise
Link Me
Home
Thursday, November 03, 2005
Milloy vs. Howard
The Washington Post's Courtland Milloy has gotten himself in a bit of controversy. WAPO's Metro columnist wrote Sunday about the appearance of President Bush at Howard University, and the corresponding protest that followed. These are the first couple of paragraphs in the column:
It was Soul Food Thursday at Howard University last week, and many students were looking forward to their favorite meal: fried chicken, macaroni and cheese, collard greens and cornbread. At lunchtime, however, students discovered that much of the campus had been locked down and that the school's cafeteria was off limits.
Apparently, many of them did not know that President Bush and first lady Laura Bush had arrived for a "youth summit" at the Blackburn Center, where the dining hall is located. Stomachs began to growl, tempers flared, and, eventually, a student protest ensued.
Wow. A very simplistic and demeaning piece, to say the least. Hell; I'm surprised he didn't add watermelon to the menu. I'm sure Howard students probably didn't know Bush was in there, but to say they were protesting because they were missing out on "Soul Food Thursday"? Talk about no respect, nor a willingness to give them the benefit of the doubt. Milloy did everything but call them "coons".
The funny thing about this column is that the column was supposed to be a critical piece on President Bush, as Milloy is an unabashed leftist and Bush hater. According to Milloy, Bush should have known there was going to be trouble, seeing that, well, he shut down the cafe during Soul Food Thursday. He should have anticipated this reaction and changed the venue for a different day or time. He actually had the nerve to compare this incident to the government's response to Katrina.
The comments at the end of the column is what really set Howard off:
Howard is not some hotbed of political activism. The biggest event of the year is homecoming, which features two fashion shows, a step show and lots of hip-hop celebrities. As the rapper Ludacris put it in his summer hit, "Pimpin' All Over the World":
Jump in the car and ride for hours,
Makin' sure I don't miss the homecoming at Howard.
To set off a student protest at this school, you'd have to be politically tone-deaf in the extreme, out of touch and flying blind. And yet, Bush did it.
However, Milloy is having his own Katrina moment, as the column pissed off a lot of people at Howard. On Monday, Howard President H. Patrick Swygert (is he kin to Jimmy? Jus askin) wrote a letter in response to Milloy's column:
I am writing in response to the outrageous and ill-founded comments made by Courtland Milloy in his Washington Post column on Sunday, October 30. One certainly would expect Mr. Milloy to know better than to form his opinions based on a second-hand source, the broadcast that he apparently saw on Fox 5 (WTTG-TV) news. Beyond that, the tone of his column with its appalling stereotyping of the more than 10,000 students at Howard University is quite shocking. And this at a time when the nation is honoring the memory of Rosa Parks, who 50 years ago stood up for the dignity of the African-American community.
It is quite ironic that even in the face of the student protest that ensued, Mr. Milloy would seek to characterize Howard University as a politically indifferent party school. Further, to suggest that the driving motivation behind the student protest was to “break through campus security to get to the cordoned-off cafeteria” was both inaccurate and a misrepresentation. Our students are extremely aware and continue, in the finest tradition of the University, to be at the forefront in the quest for social justice and equality for our community. In recent times, for example, they led the march to the Supreme Court in support of the University of Michigan in Grutter vs. Bollinger. They serve in great numbers as volunteers in the Washington, D.C., area; and they continue to rally to the aid of victims of Hurricane Katrina by welcoming and supporting the students from the disaster-area colleges. Milloy wasn't done, though. Here's his response:
You claim to be upset because I wrote that "Howard is not a hotbed of political activism," and you cite the school's legacy of social protest and political activism. But what have you done lately? A walk down to the Mall for the Millions More Movement, an AIDS Walk and participation in get-out-the-vote rallies does not make your heirs to Walter Rodney or Kwame Toure.
What about honoring the legacy of Roland Scott (chairman of pediatrics at Howard from 1949 to 1973 and the driving force behind the Sickle Cell Anemia Control Act of 1971)? Your school has the Center for Sickle Cell Disease, but the organizers of annual walks to find a cure for that dreadful disease can't get you to participate for the life of those hurting black babies.
The home of Carter G. Woodson, a Howard professor and father of Black History Month, almost fell to the ground before the federal government stepped in to save it. Where were you? And why weren't you at the Optimal Health for Black Men conference, held last month at Howard Hospital? A lot of outstanding black doctors, psychologists, scientists and educators gave presentations. You protest about not being invited to Laura Bush's "youth summit," but you are nowhere to be found when your elders hold a lifesaving summit just for you. Milloy took them to task, and called them out on their reluctance to engage in activism. To show Milloy's leftist credentials, in an interview with Howard's " The Hilltop" (free reg. required) he claimed he was hard on Howard because they were supposedly "The Talented Tenth", a throwback socialist ideal developed by W.E.B. DuBois that claimed only 10% of the black community possesses the skills and abilities to lead the other 90%.
This little spat kind of reminds me of something Thomas Sowell said when he was asked why aren't there any great black leaders anymore; he replied if we still had over 100 black people being lynched every year, we'd have better leaders. Youth are reluctant to get involved in activities like these because there isn't an underlying factor that compels them to come out and do so. They weren't engaged to do so at home, they aren't compelled to do so at school, so they aren't going to do it voluntarily.
If Milloy wanted activism, he got it. He mocked the idea that students were actually preparing a protest in the second column; the next day, there were approx. 100 Howard students protesting (Hilltop - free reg required) outside of the Washington Post. Milloy wasn't there, though, as he was preparing for his son's 16th birthday.
Reading the reactions on the net to this incident, I've seen a lot of people compare Milloy's second column to comments made by Bill Cosby. Sure; there's a comparison. But then they inaccurately analyze this to mean that there's a conservative movement that will grow out of this. Please. As I said about Cosby, this has nothing to do with conservatism; it has to do with elitism. Milloy sounds like a grumpy grandfather that always thinks things were better back in the day. They are on the same side, just not on the same page.
While we should be appreciative of efforts spawned from political movements and activism gone by, to compare those days to the present is ridiculous, especially since those who are complaining laid the path to THESE DAYS. After all; Howard's laxadaiscial students didn't get that way on their own; they were helped by the previous generation. And that could be seen as a good thing and a bad thing, as they helped provide a better environment for them to live and thrive in, yet that comfort allowed contentment and laziness. That's help to create a new span of problems no only at Howard, but within the black community as a whole.
You can't fix 2005 problems with 1955 solutions. The simple fact that Milloy is so willing to talk about what used to happen and try to characterize Howard students in such an elitist and archaic way shows that neither Howard University nor Milloy truly has the answers as to why this happened or how it can be fixed.
Posted at 12:23 pm by Expertise
Link Me
Home
Wednesday, November 02, 2005
Maryland black Dems: race attacks on Steele is fair game.
Maryland black Dems: race attacks on Steele is fair game.
Do we really need more evidence why the current black politicians and political figures do a disservice to black people across this nation?
Well check this out....Maryland black Democrats - not simply the rank and file, but in leadership positions - think it's okay to use racial slurs against Maryland Lieutenant Governor Michael Steele because he is a Republican:
State Sen. Lisa A. Gladden, a black Baltimore Democrat, said she does not expect her party to pull any punches, including racial jabs at Mr. Steele, in the race to replace retiring Democratic U.S. Sen. Paul S. Sarbanes.
"Party trumps race, especially on the national level," she said. "If you are bold enough to run, you have to take whatever the voters are going to give you. It's democracy, perhaps at its worse, but it is democracy."
Delegate Salima Siler Marriott, a black Baltimore Democrat, said Mr. Steele invites comparisons to a slave who loves his cruel master or a cookie that is black on the outside and white inside because his conservative political philosophy is, in her view, anti-black.
"Because he is a conservative, he is different than most public blacks, and he is different than most people in our community," she said. "His politics are not in the best interest of the masses of black people." I'm sure black people in Maryland can puff up their chests with pride at the ignorance of two of their elected representatives, women minorities no less. The fact is, they always resort to these types of attacks whenever they feel threatened by a black conservative. This was their way of letting people know in advance.
- Steele will offer some kind of policy, they will call him a lawn jockey.
- Steele will call for safer neighborhoods, they will call him an Uncle Tom.
- If Steele doesn't give them the answer they want to hear, they will doctor a photo and call him a Sambo.
See how this works? This is all "fair game".
Some have gone so far as to suggest that this is just another measure of "dirty politics". It's definitely dirty, no doubt, but this is more than just a simple smear campaign. This goes to the heart of black politics and the problems with the community as a whole. If you don't follow the script, you will be burned.
I hope Steele has a strong chin. He's going to need it.
Posted at 12:47 pm by Expertise
Link Me
Home
|
|
 |