Expertise's Politics and Sports Blog


Monday, January 24, 2005
Conference Championship Wrap-Up.

Well, the games are over, and the championships went just about how I expected them to go.

There were a few things that didn't happen.  I was hoping for snow.  Instead I got snowhills.  No clouds, no fog, nothing.  In fact I think the sun was out during the Falcons/Eagles game at the Linc.  Oh well.

But as for the games themselves, they were somewhat entertaining.  And it was great watching the game while discussing it on two discussion boards; OkayPlayer and Football Outsiders.

First let's talk about the NFC Title game.  Everyone tonight is happy because Donovan McNabb finally got to the big one, but just like Elway in 98, he really got there by riding the coattails of his running back and their defense and not making any big mistakes.  I didn't see who was Fox's player of the game, but no doubt it should have been Brian Westbrook.

I'm really impressed with Westbrook's versatility.  In college he was the first running back in NCAA history to ever post 1,000 running yards and 1,000 reception yards.  That makes it very hard to come up with a decent pass blitz to beat McNabb with because you always have to worry about where he is going to be on the field.

Meanwhile, the Falcons couldn't get anything off the ground.  The running game was shut down for most of the game save a couple of drives.  Vick tried to get something going on his feet, but was constantly battered by Philly's front four and linebackers.  And the passing game...well, passing game and Falcons mix as well as oil and water.

And that's what it comes down to; Michael Vick is a one-dimensional player.  People look at Vick and they see lightning in pads and they think his feet can keep the Falcons winning, but the truth is that the defense is the life or death of that team.  If the defense has a bad day, more than likely the Falcons won't have a chance.  If the defense has a good day, the Falcons have a chance to win football games.

You are not going to win Super Bowls off running the ball alone, because then your defense has to make up for the lack of scoring a one-dimensional running game brings.  You rarely see an offense that only runs the ball put up 30-40 points on the board.  You go up against a team that can throw bombs and put points up on the board early and guess what?  You have to get rid of the running game, because it runs too much time off the clock.

And that's precisely what Vick had to do in the fourth quarter; they had been so focused on running the ball and not opening up their passing game that once the Eagles got into double digits in the fourth, he had no choice but to pass the ball.  When that happened, I told people on the board the game was over, and they never disputed it.

In an article for the Boston Globe, Football Outsiders editor-in-chief Aaron Schatz explained the phenonmeon of the winning rushing offense:

Because the game clock stops on an incomplete pass, but continues to run after a player with the ball is tackled in bounds, teams that are ahead shy away from throwing the ball. They want to avoid an incomplete that might stop the clock and leave more time for the opposing team to mount a comeback. The top two teams this season in fourth-quarter carries from running backs were the Steelers and Patriots. Nine teams ran the ball on more than 45 percent of their fourth-quarter plays, and all nine teams had winning records. In 2003, every single team that ran the ball on more than 40 percent of its fourth quarter plays had a winning record except for San Francisco.

Football experts hold up this season's first Pittsburgh-New England game, a 34-20 Pittsburgh victory, as an example of how important the running game can be. Pittsburgh ran the ball 49 times, New England only six – in the entire game. But Pittsburgh threw the ball as often as they ran with it in the first half: 18 passes, 19 runs. In the second half, the Steelers ran 30 times and passed only six.

So teams with high rushing totals aren't necessarily establishing their running game from the first snap onward. When a winning football team has a high rushing total, it is very likely they got many of those yards while running out the clock.

In short, with rare exceptions, teams don't win because they run. They run because they win.

Well, I'm sure some will say, "Yeah, but Atlanta is that exception."

Well guess what?  They weren't today.  And they won't be when it comes to teams that have a strong front four and a decent linebacker set that are able to keep Vick contained in the backfield.  Sure; they'll win enough games to be playoff contenders, but they will never be a legit Super Bowl threat until Vick learns how to get the ball to his receivers. 

As for the AFC Title Game, there really isn't much to say.  Roethlisberger played like a rookie, Brady once again did what it took to win decisively, and Cowher is now 1-4 in AFC Championship Games....at home.  Guess what you'll hear from the Pittsburgh papers next week.

The Patriots defense didn't dismantle Big Ben, but they definitely made sure he wasn't a major factor in the game.  Roethlisberger was picked three times today, making this his worst outing of the year. 

On the other side of the coin, Pittsburgh tried to rely on their front four to stop the run and didn't blitz Tom Brady.  Bad mistake.  While they did keep Corey Dillon quiet, Brady let loose of a couple of bombs in the first half.  Add that to Steelers turnovers, and it was 24-3 at the half.  The Steelers never came within 11 points of the Patriots for the rest of the game.

I talked about this last night; you've got to place pressure on Brady and you got to do it the whole game.  You can't let Brady or almost any quarterback in the NFL sit in the pocket and throw at will.  Brady is at his best when he can take about 8-10 seconds sitting in the pocket and finally hitting the receiver, as the Steelers allowed him to do for most of the first half.  Brady eventually turned that secondary into mush during the second half.

What the New England Patriots have been able to do in the last four years is remarkable.  All the dynasty and Hall of Fame talk can cease, because the Patriots are that dynasty and Bellichek and Brady already have their spots in the Hall of Fame.  To play at this kind of level in the current NFL conditions is unbelievable, and it will be fun to see what kind of destructive scheme Bill Bellichek has waiting for Donovan McNabb on February 6th in Jacksonville.

Posted at 02:24 am by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home




Sunday, January 23, 2005
NFL conference championship games review.

It would have been wiser if I had did my review earlier this week, but oh well.

We're looking at a pretty large blizzard that's hitting the northeast this weekend.  The thing is, I doubt if the snow plays a huge factor in any of these games.  But it sure will make for one helluva broadcast.

First is the NFC Title game between the Atlanta Falcons and the Philadelphia Eagles.

I should make it clear from the start that I don't like either team.  For Atlanta, they are the rivals to my team, the Carolina Panthers. Other than that, I think they are overachievers, even with the weakest NFC on record, and no impressive wins during this season.  Their offense relies on a quarterback that is doomed for "has been" status when he gets chin checked by the right blitzing linebacker, which will result in Arthur Blank realizing he's wasted tons of money on probably the most vulnerable quarterback in the league.

But hey, they are enjoying it while they can.  After all, a season or two is worth wasting $130 million (well, $37 mill guaranteed plus the annual salary), right?

On the other side of the coin, you have the Eagles, aka the 90's Buffalo Bills Jr.  I say Jr. because at least the Bills got to the Super Bowl before they choked.  The Eagles can't get out of the conference title game. You wouldn't know that, however, while listening to their obnoxious shit-talking fans explain their greatness.  Hence, imagine what kind of spirits I was in a year ago watching Carolina's secondary led by rookie Ricky Manning make a mockery of pro-bowler Donovan McNabb.  Oh I was in RARE form the Monday after the game.

I used to like the Eagles.  Then I actually met Eagles fans.  That killed the admiration real quick.  Besides, it's hard not to hate a team that has Terrell "We're 99-1, but I'm not getting the ball enough" Owens and Freddie "I stole The Rock's nickname, and now I am the greatest receiver in the world by having a decent game against the worst secondary in playoffs history" Mitchell.  The only person I like on the team is their coach, Andy Reid, who is the second best coach in the league behind Bill Bellichek (John Fox is a close third, of course).

Hence, if I could control fate, the Falcons would win 6-3, with both offenses being extremely crappy and a field goal to win it from an interception picked off by Brooking gets the deal done in overtime.  Of course, that'll never happen, so let me go into analyst mode and try to put this game into perspective.

First of all, it will come down to defense.  The team with the better defense and the better secondary will win this game.  From what I've seen, the defensive edge has to be given to the Philadelphia Eagles.  As I stated, Reid is a good coach, and will have that secondary prepared to go after Vick and Warrick Dunn.  Expect to see a lot of zone defense in this one with Eagles mdlb Jeremiah Trotter placing a spy on the ballhandler, whether it's Vick or Dunn.  I also think Reid will deploy some blitzes from the secondary, particularly with the safeties.

Only problem with that is Algee Crumpler.  Crumpler is the true difference maker in that Falcons offense because he provides the only glimpse of a passing attack they have.  It's going to be hard for Trotter to keep Vick at bay while the other lbs cover Crumpler.  Thus the outside lbs HAVE TO DO THEIR JOB.  If they don't, Vick will put that ball in the air in Crumpler's vicinity and he will catch it.  And if/when he does catch it, you've got to punish him for it.  Make no mistake; the Eagles linebackers have the most daunting task ahead of them all year because they have to spy on Vick and Dunn while keeping Crumpler covered.

The Falcons don't have as much pressure on them, but the lack of talent in the secondary is going to be a huge problem.  Can they cover their man or area to give the lbs enough time to get to McNabb?  Sure; they've been able to do it most of the year, but what happens if that pass rush breaks down while Pinkston or Mitchell goes deep?  That's a big problem, because I'm convinced that Ray Buchanan and those safeties look forward to getting burned every single week.  If they allow Mitchell to do his silly championship belt pose more than 5 times in the game, the Falcons are going to have a long day.

Thus, this game is an analyst's dream, or nightmare depending on how much you like a challenge.  There are so many mitigating factors, like: 

- Will the Falcons secondary be able to cover the Eagles's receiving corp?

- How many times will the Falcons secondary get burned?

- Will the Falcon pass rush place pressure on McNabb and be able to sack him?

- Can Trotter keep Vick contained and inflict punishment on him when he steps up to the line of scrimmage?

- Will Warrick Dunn make a mockery of that Eagles front line?

- Can Westbrook overcome one of the best rushing defenses in the league?

- Will McNabb be forced to scramble his way out of sacks and convert on third down?

- Will the offensive line show up and keep Brooking and Ramsey out of the pocket?

- Will Vick be able to throw between the safeties and linebackers and connect with Algee Crumpler?

- Who will have the better day:  Peerless Price or Freddie Mitchell?

- How much of a factor will that piercing wind a snow play on both running and passing games?
See what I mean?  There are simply too many circumstances riding with both teams because you never know who will show up and who won't, and any one of these things could be the thing that makes the difference in this game.

To be honest, I don't want to make a prediction on this game.  But I'm going to....later.

Let's talk about the Steelers vs. Patriots AFC title rumble first.

This will probably be the most physical game you've seen all year.  Seriously.  If someone doesn't take a ride on the cart or on a stretcher I will definitely be surprised. 

Both of these teams have defenses that like to hurt people.  Both teams have running backs that would love nothing more than to run some poor sap over like a Mac truck rolling over a grape.  Add snow to it, and you have the makings of another classic.

At quarterback you have Tom Brady vs. The Next Tom Brady.  On one hand you have a guy that's been a winner ever since he became a starting quarterback, and has only tasted defeat twice in his last 35 games.  On the other hand you have a big brusing rookie quarterback that has yet to taste defeat.  Ever.  For a rookie quarterback to do the things he done is completely unheard of.

Most people would talk about these teams' respective defenses.  Nah.  I'd rather talk about their offenses.  You see, I think the defenses of both teams provide a necessary distraction to their offenses because everyone sees them as so daunting that beating the defense is the way to win football games.

After watching the Patriots vs. Indianapolis, I think folks have got it all wrong.  Beating the defense is a key step in winning against them, but it isn't THE key step.  The key step is beating the offense.  If anyone has noticed, Brady only plays to the level required to score enough points to beat you decisively.  You're rarely going to see the Pats blow out teams, at least in scoring terms.  20-6, 35-28, 23-7, 31-17....it's not a blowout, but he'll make sure that you are down by a couple of scores in the fourth quarter.

In order to shake the Patriots up, you've got to attack Brady.  Only problem is, that means you have to beat that vaunted Patriots' offensive line, and they protect Brady like a mother bear protects her cub.  But if the Steelers are able to get to him,  they have an easy ride getting to Brady.  Brady isn't a mobile quarterback, so sacks should be on the menu and you might be able to get him to make a few mistakes as well.  The Steelers would only help themselves if they constantly review that Patriots/Dolphins game on MNF earlier this year in order to see what schemes they were using to attack Brady and force him to throw picks.  But if you allow Brady to sit in that pocket, he will cut that Steelers secondary into shards.  I really don't think there is a secondary in this league that Tom Brady can't beat if given the time.

Same thing goes with the Patriots defense.  The secondary will be the key to this game, as they will have to cover receivers and not panic when they see Roethlisberger use his feet.  He's not coming off of that line of scrimmage; all he's doing is biding his time until he can find an oper receiver in the flats or running an out pattern to the sidelines.  Zone coverage designed to take the sidelines away from him and force him to throw in the middle of the field will be the best plan for Bellichek and that defense in this game. 

The running game is going to come down to heart.  Jerome Bettis, aka "The Bus", more than likely will retire either here or in Jacksonville on the 6th.  Where he retires will depend on how consistent he is in this game. 

3 yards here, 4 yards there isn't going to be enough.  You're going to need 7-8 yard games to be the regular carry in the game, and maybe Bettis or Staley will break out for a big gain.  If that doesn't happen, the Steelers might as well stay home and make fishing plans, because there is no way the Steelers can put so much pressure on Roethlisberger without something to offset that defense.  Bellichek, the evil genius that he is, is probably itching to eat that kid alive.

Corey Dillon has been the rock hard running back for the Patriots, considered the best acquisition in the offseason last year.  Well now it's time for him to make his money.  While I don't expect him to run for over 150 yards against that Steelers front line, he's got to dish out some punishment and wear that defense down much in the same manner they did Indianapolis as they convert on third downs.

So here are my picks:

For the AFC Title game, the Patriots will come out the winner.  As Chris Carter said, I'm not betting against Bill Bellichek again.  And I agree with a comment that Shannon Sharpe made in last week's Jets/Steelers game where Cowher will become the same old coach he's always been, and Roethlisberger will be reduced to the rookie he really is.  While I think Pittsburgh's offense is much grittier the Colts receiever corp, I can't see Ben doing enough to beat a defense that shut down Indianapolis so decisively and has to be hyped up to do the same this week.

For the NFC Title game, I got the Eagles.  They'll finally get over the hump, but not without a close call.  Eventually, Brian Westbrook putting in some good carries and making catches out of the flats will make the difference in this game.  And McNabb will be able to make plays on his feet, allowing Mitchell and Pinkston a little more time to get open and burn that secondary.  Besides, you can't place trust in a defense like the Falcons, in which you never know whether the good defense or the bad defense will show up on any given Sunday.

Regardless, these games will be classics.  Enjoy them.


Posted at 04:06 am by Expertise
Comments (1)  

Home




Saturday, January 22, 2005
NY's Hot 97 airs racist song on tsunami victims.

from the NY Sun:

A popular hip-hop radio show is in hot water over a parody that mocked victims of the South Asian tsunami catastrophe, calling them "screaming chinks" and "little Chinamen."

Yonkers-based Asian Media Watch accuses the WQHT/Hot 97 "Miss Jones in the Morning" show of "repeated racist attitudes" and demands the program's "elimination."

"The host broadcasts a horrifying song that mocks the dead South Asian tsunami victims, uses the racial slurs 'chink' and 'Chinamen,' and calls the drowning victims 'bitches,' " said AMW director Kai Yu in a letter to Hot 97's John Dimick.

Station-owner Emmis Communications issued an apology late yesterday.

"We apologize to our listeners and to anyone who was offended," Dimick said. "[The show's entire seven-person staff] has agreed to contribute one-week's pay to the tsunami-relief efforts."

The link is still on their website as Tsunami Song, but it doesn't work.

However, not only do I have the song saved on my computer, but I also have a very interesting conversation that went over the air before that song was played.

You see, one of the morning crew's personalities, Miss Info, objected to the song and tried to seperate herself from the song over the air.  This resorted into her getting chewed out by her coworkers, who claimed she wasn't being a team player and was never willing to defend their work.  In fact, they hinted at the end of the very heated argument that Info, who they identified as an Asian woman, would be fired after the show.  Jones even had the nerve to say to Info, "...and I know you feel you're superior probably because you're Asian, but you're not."  Another personality can be heard in the background saying "I'mma start shooting Asians."

I found out about this on the hip hop discussion board OkayPlayer.com, where they are really pissed over this song and the Info incident.  Several of them have written to Hot 97's corporate headquarters and directly to the station. 

It's amazing that crap like this can be placed over the air.  Due to my libertarian leanings, I don't think the government should get involved, but there is no doubt that Miss Jones and everyone else on that morning show staff minus Miss Info should be fired immediately by the station manager and by corporate. 

And I really don't see how in the HELL could Miss Info sit there and let those fools create and air that song in her presence, and when she tries to seperate herself from it, they are going to curse her out, threaten to get her fired and hurl racist comments at her...ALL OVER THE AIR.  Info didn't do one damn thing.  It's stuff like this that totally boggles my mind.

As far as I know, there isn't a set link on an internet server that would have the song available to download, and my bandwidth for blogdrive is too small to hold it.  But if you want to hear it, email me here and I could possibly send it to you via email or through AOL Instant Messenger, Yahoo Messenger or MSN Messenger when I am online.

Personally, I think the blogosphere needs to get the word out even further and make sure that these bigots never think about doing this again.

Posted at 05:13 am by Expertise
Comments (2)  

Home




Friday, January 21, 2005
Did Cosby touch a naughty place?

From the Associated Press:

LOS ANGELES (AP) - A female acquaintance of comedian Bill Cosby has made an allegation against him that has prompted a police investigation in Pennsylvania, the entertainer's attorney said Thursday.

Los Angeles attorney Walter Phillips would not discuss the specifics of the allegation - which he called "utterly preposterous" - but said it amounts to, at the most, "inappropriate touching."

No charges have been brought against Cosby, but Phillips said authorities have begun an investigation. He said the accuser, who lives in Canada, knows Cosby and the alleged incident in question happened about a year ago.

Considering the fact that no details have come out in regards to the particular incident, it's possible that this isn't that big of a deal and Cosby is innocent.  However, Cosby has cancelled several speaking invitations, according to Cleveland's NewsNet 5.  At the very least, he's taking this accusation seriously.

Most people know about Cosby's last woman problem, which came in the form of a supposed love child from an affair over 30 years ago.  Problem was, the woman that was supposed to be his daughter tried to extort over $40 million from him.  It ended up being an FBI sting, and she was evicted and put in prison.  No paternity test was taken to prove whether Cosby was the father, although he had been financially supporting the mistress and the woman in order to keep the affair a secret.

It's been rumored that the affair was only one of Cosby's daillances from years past.  I don't know.  But would the wizened old man that has taken a Solomonic, holier-than-thou attitude in the past year or so would engage in extramaritial affairs AND in sexual assault?

Eh.  I'll have to wait this one out.  Although Cosby really doesn't deserve it, I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.  But there's no doubt that the whole situation has to be totally false and that Cosby never touched the woman, welcomed or unwelcomed.  Anything less than that and Cosby's reputation would be further tarnished.

Posted at 05:56 am by Expertise
Comments (1)  

Home




Thursday, January 20, 2005
Correction.

This afternoon I posted a news story from Fox News reporting that Patrick Burke, supposedly Michael Moore's bodyguard, was arrested for carrying an unlicensed weapon in New York.

Here's the story:

NEW YORK — Filmmaker Michael Moore's bodyguard was arrested for carrying an unlicensed weapon in New York's JFK airport Wednesday night.

Police took Patrick Burke, who says Moore employs him, into custody after he declared he was carrying a firearm at a ticket counter. Burke is licensed to carry a firearm in Florida and California, but not in New York. Burke was taken to Queens central booking and could potentially be charged with a felony for the incident.

Moore's 2003 Oscar-winning film "Bowling for Columbine" criticizes what Moore calls America's "culture of fear" and its obsession with guns.

Well, Patrick Burke's real employer mailed the guys at MooreWatch.com and corrected the story.  Here's the letter:

Dear Moorewatch Editors:

Our firm employs Patrick Burk.

Fox News has now removed the link for this story from their home page; their original story contained several errors (below).  We want to be certain you are aware of the appropriate corrections.

I know that Fox News editors must rely upon others when preparing their stories, and I offer with no judgment that their story titled “Michael Moore’s Bodyguard Arrested on Airport Gun Charge” contains several errors, including its entire headline.

Please correct the errors in your story below as soon as possible, because, as you are aware, the errors reach an ever-widening audience with each passing minute - and will predictably be picked up by other news agencies.

Our full-time employee, Patrick Burk, is not “Michael Moore’s bodyguard.” Accordingly, the headline in the Fox News Web site story is false and misleading.

If you believe Patrick Burk was ever assigned to protect Michael Moore, or any number of other public figures, you might accurately report that “A bodyguard who was once assigned to protect Michael Moore...”

You could as accurately say “A bodyguard that was once assigned to protect President Clinton,” because Patrick Burk has also been assigned to protect President Clinton in the past - but you wouldn’t be accurate if you said “President Clinton’s Bodyguard.”

Patrick Burk is not Michael Moore’s bodyguard, nor was he protecting Michael Moore or in any way involved with Michael Moore on Wednesday night, when he (Burk) was checking in at JFK for a flight to Los Angeles.

When checking in for the flight, Patrick Burk voluntarily advised United Airlines that he was transporting an unloaded, locked firearm in his checked luggage, precisely as regulations require, and not “carrying” a weapon, as your story inaccurately reports.  Advising the counter ticket agent is a routine procedure for police officers and security professionals.  In this case, a Port Authority officer decided to arrest Patrick Burk on the charge that he is not licensed to carry a firearm in New York City.

The Fox web site headline contains an error not present in the story.  The headline indicates that Patrick Burk was arrested on an “airport gun charge.” He was not.  The charge involves having a firearm without a New York City License to carry it.  On that note, Patrick Burk was not carrying a weapon on his person (only locked in his baggage), and the police do not allege that he was carrying a weapon on his person, as your story implies.

Police, security professionals, sportsmen, and citizen gun owners who fly on the Nation’s airlines are legally bound to advise the airlines of firearms in their checked baggage - and the firearms are transported just like any other baggage.

The Fox News story also says Patrick Burk was carrying “an unlicensed firearm.” Please correct that error.  Patrick Burk’s firearm is legally registered to Patrick Burk - it is not “unlicensed.” Patrick Burk is licensed to carry a firearm in several States, and a court will determine if any charge is appropriate for Patrick Burk in this matter, which involves New York City.

Though I realize a Michael Moore connection would be of interest to your web site, Patrick Burk is not Michael Moore’s bodyguard, and has never been employed by Michael Moore.

An important note for you is that Patrick Burk is not a public figure and even the smallest inaccurate detail that is widely disseminated could predictably interfere with his ability to pursue his profession.  Patrick Burk is a former Marine who served with distinction in an elite and specialized Marine unit, and he protected, among others, then-President Clinton.

Our firm (www.gavindebecker.com) provides protective coverage for public figures and others, and Patrick Burk is a leading professional in his field.

I highlighted in red below the specific errors where they appear in the Fox News story.

Please let me know that you have received this email, and if you need further information or need to reach our firm, please call (redacted), and ask for (redacted).

Sincerely-

Gavin de Becker

So, Moore is in the clear.  I don't know how in the world Fox News screwed that up, but a public correction on their website is an order.  Fox did delete the link for the previous story.

But if anyone got that story from this blog, I apologize.

Posted at 03:26 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home

Boxer must have been punch-drunk

I've been paying attention to Dr. Rice's confirmation hearing as well.

And I'm watching a new champion for the left emerge in Congress.  Barbara Boxer, who now has six more years before she's directly held accountable for these foolish actions after winning reelection in November, has made quite a bit of noise this month.

I won't go into it too much, since KingBarber and most of the right side of the blogosphere have ranted enough for all of us combined.  However, I did want to place my five cents into it.

You see, it's events like these that make the blogosphere the premiere source of information in the world.  You really can be an "instapundit".  Unfortunately for Dr. Rice, she's being put on the spot, and can't take time to look at what Sen. Boxer and others have said on the very issue they've impuning her on.

CrushKerry was one of the first to expose Boxer's false claim of the content within the Iraqi War Resolution.  It was far from being only or even primarily about weapons of mass destruction.  Then again, she never knew it because she didn't read it.

Somehow she also forgotten that she admitted there were WMD's in Iraq a little more than two years ago.  Here's what Sen. Boxer said in November 2002:
"Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement."
For Democrats in Washington, history started yesterday, and anything before that only happened the way they "remember" it.  Thus, they can't be held accountable for the things they said even a couple of weeks ago.

That's not the only thing.  Boxer also distorted Rice's statement to Senator Voinovich in regards to the tsunami.  Here's what Dr. Rice actually said:

VOINOVICH: I think what we're doing in the tsunami right now is wonderful. I think it's -- but we have got to show people that we love them, that we are for democracy, that we want them to enjoy the same thing but we haven't any hidden motives.

What are you planning on doing in that area to respond to that?

RICE: Senator, first of all, I do agree that the tsunami was a wonderful opportunity to show not just the U.S. government, but the heart of the American people. And I think it has paid great dividends for us.
Thus, Rice was responding to Voinovich's comment on how the federal government could eliminate any worries about "hidden motives".  Not only did Boxer take the comment out of context - making it seem as if the Bush Administration was exploiting the situation - but she was responding to a question that Voinovich asked.

Boxer and her ilk aren't done yet.  Even though the Senate Foreign Relations Panel approved her 16-2, they are trying to get it delayed until next week, as to not confirm her on the same day Bush is inaugurated for his second term. 

Why?  Simply out of spite.  Democrats claim they want to debate Rice's confirmation for a few more hours.  What good will come out of that?  It makes no sense for Democrats to delay the obvious, especially since they are more than willing to confirm the cabinet positions of Mike Johanns, the new Agriculture Secretary, and Margaret Spellings, the new Education Secretary.

One day Democrats will learn that it's childish behavior like this that will continue to keep them in the minority of Congress and out of the White House.

UPDATE:  Another lie was found by James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal's Best of the Web.  Boxer claimed 25% of our servicemen that have been killed in Iraq were from California.  She wasn't even halfway right; it's only 11.7%, according to Casualties.org.

Posted at 03:33 am by Expertise
Comments (3)  

Home




Wednesday, January 19, 2005
Manning and Culpepper.

Indy quarterback Peyton Manning and Minnesota QB Daunte Culpepper are seen as the top two quarterbacks in the NFL today.  This year, Manning broke Marino's 20-year touchdown passing record with 49 this season.  Culpepper was in a zone all year, throwing for over 5,000 passing yards this season.

On Sunday, both of these great quarterbacks were stopped yet again in their quest for a trip to the Super Bowl.  Culpepper was humbled by Philadelphia, while Manning was completely shut down by New England.  Both of them have to wait for another January to reach the pinnacle of any football player's career.

What can these two do to get their teams on the same page as they are in order to get over the hump? 

Culpepper's scenario is much easier to figure out, yet much harder to accomplish.  They need help with the secondary, which gave up more yards than any team to make the playoffs in NFL history.  They also needs a defensive coordinator that isn't afraid to get physical and can come up with defensive schemes that will finally put some pressure on the opposing quarterback.

Unfortuately, the Vikings aren't willing to do that.  Mike Tice will continue to be a player's coach, which means he will bring on someone - or keep someone -  that will work around the players instead of the players conforming to the gameplan that's desirable and effective to score victories.  As many games as Minnesota lost due to last minute defensive chokes, heads should have rolled.

The best way to help them through this situation is by trading Randy Moss.  Culpepper can get by without Moss, and his talent and the defensive personnel gained by doing so could make up for the loss of Moss's talent.  But it's obvious that in order for Minnesota to make it to the next level, something's got to change.

As for Manning, Indy's problems are much harder.  The team is as good as it's ever been.  However, they do need to invest in some secondary that can get physical with receivers and make plays against some of the taller wideouts.  Being a former defensive coordinator, Dungy should be able to get those guys trained to knock some receivers around.

But the main problem is how the Indianapolis receiver corp reacts to physical defenses, as they were dropping passes left and right throughout the game.  Temperature and weather conditions may have been a factor in their loss, but the bottom line is that the receivers need to man up.  Edge needs to step up his game next year too, if he decides to stay at Indy.

Regardless, it's going to be hard for both teams to do anything that will make them stronger teams and get over key obstacles next season.  Hopefully, these two won't suffer the same fate Dan Marino did; a good quarterback who never won the big one.

Posted at 12:31 am by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home




Sunday, January 16, 2005
Divisional Playoffs recap.

Well, the home teams won, and out of those winners, three of the four won decisively.

Since it's still fresh in my mind, let me talk about how Indianapolis was absolutely drug through the snow at Foxboro against the Patriots. 

It was one of those games where nothing but the score stayed close throughout the game.  Manning only got into the redzone once, and that resulted in the only field goal of the game.  Despite the new receiver contact rule, New England's secondary made a mockery out of Indy's receiver corp.  There was nothing they could do to move the ball down the field and complete the drives they've been doing all year.

And please note; this year's Indianapolis Colts had the fourth highest scoring percentage in NFL history, yet they only managed three points today.  Manning had no one to throw to, he was being pressured by the defensive line and linebacker set, and James was ineffective while running the ball.  Three and out was the name of the game all day for the Colts.

Meanwhile, Tom Brady continued to be Tom Brady.  Despite being pressured by the best pass rusher in the league, Dwight Freeney, he was able to get off his trademark short passes and move the ball downfield.  Corey Dillon was the workhorse, bouncing off of blockers and breaking tackles throughout the game.  Indianapolis never had a chance against all of these factors.

Brady and Dillon slow-grinded that defense.  Take a look at the drive summary for the game.  There was one drive in the third quarter where they steadily went downfield and eventually scored a touchdown on that took over eight minutes on, and another one that took seven and a half.  Hell, Manning only got four chances to score in the second half.  You're not going to win football games like that.

Everyone, including me, has been talking about how the Indianapolis Colts has been unstoppable all year, and Peyton Manning is at the top of his game.  However, we forgot about Brady's consistency and the genius of the best coach in the National Football League, Bill Bellichek.  If I was the Steelers, I would be very afraid of this team next Sunday. 

Why?  Because Saturday evening the Steelers had to pull some luck to walk out of Heinz Field with a win over the Jets.  If it wasn't for the Jets missing two fg's - one in the fourth that hit the crossbar and another in overtime that went wide left - the Steelers would be taking an early winter vacation.

If I was a Steeler fan, I wouldn't get too excited about that win.  This is the same Jets team that lost to the Rams to close out the regular season and just barely got into the playoffs.  And the Steelers looked quite normal on Saturday evening.

Big Ben Roethlisberger, the rookie quarterback that is the Baby Jesus of the Steel Curtain, looked like a rookie playing against the Jets, making erratic passes and throwing picks.  The Bus and the Duce had to work for every rushing yard they got, and Jets QB Chad Pennington had a decent game against that Steelers' secondary.  If Roethlisberger plays like that against New England's patchwork secondary, and the Steelers' secondary allows Brady to make plays to compliment the rushing prowess of Dillon, who didn't play in the first game between these two teams during the regular season, The Bus will make an early visit into that retirement junkyard.

The NFC playoffs saw two blowouts that either team should be that excited about.

Saturday's game was a farce.  The St. Louis Rams didn't deserve to be on the same field as Atlanta, much less the playoffs.  And I never saw a team that could have been beaten solely by their opponent's special teams offense, as Allen Rossum averaged a playoff-record 49.7 yards per return.

I say solely because Michael Vick and Warrick Dunn turned the game into a marathon, running for a combined 317 yards in the game.  The Rams' front line should have just stepped aside and allowed the Falcons to do what they wanted.  And you know things are bad when Peerless Price is making touchdown catches.

You have to feel sorry for Marc Bulger.  He is a good quarterback, but the fact is that he can't do it alone.  He has the sorriest coach in the league right now that simply wastes the talent on that team.  They have a potentially good running back in Stephen Jackson that could be part of the future of that franchise if put to use, but all Martz wants to focus on is the passing game.  The Rams secondary has some athletic DB's, but it means nothing because the Rams don't have any kind of pass rush from their front line and linebackers.  Until Martz is gone, the fact is the Rams will struggle.

As for Minnesota, they returned to normal today after stepping it up last week and lost to Philly.

If I was Vikings owner Red McCombs, I would fire the Vikings' defensive coordinator.  It was as if they never watched last year's NFC Championship Game, and thus made Freddie "The People's Champ" Mitchell and Todd Pinkston look like All-Pro receivers.  They played those two soft, and did not draw pressure onto Donovan McNabb.  McNabb had plenty of time in the pocket to make any pass he wanted.

Meanwhile, there's Mike Tice, who panicked after falling behind 21-7 in the second quarter and started making erratic playcalls that eventually blew the game for them.  The Vikings played as if every drive was their last, rather than making sound plays that would move the ball down the field and put points on the board.  Tice is another coach who can not seem to draw upon the talent that's on that team.  Allow Culpepper to run the offense, but the emphasis this offseason should be the defense.

I'll talk about the conflicts that Culpepper and Manning both have with their respective teams, as well as review the conference championship games later this week.

Posted at 10:35 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home

Vision Circle vs. Malkin

The other day I was blogsurfing and through LaShawn's site I found a little tidbit on the Vision Circle blog.

So, Michelle Malkin gets hate mail. What's the big deal?

Really.

What makes her special?

Putting this off on Armstrong Williams is low.

Real low.

She's whining. She's playing victocrat/victim/victimology.

The email is foul, but still...

 He's reacting to Malkin's blog post, as well as her syndicated column.  Malkin was saying she was getting hate mail asking or accusing her of being on the take like Armstrong Williams.

I have to agree with Vision Circle.  Malkin isn't dumb.  She knows how the pundit game goes.  Anyone that gives political opinions are sure to expect some to like you and others to hate you.  And yes, the criticism that comes from your opinions do not have limits and will include every blow-below-the-belt you could think of.  While such statements are unwarranted and are disgraceful, it should be expected.

I gave up on the idea long ago that every person in the world is civilized enough to have a civil discusssion.  As time has gone by, insults and spiteful comments are the norm within society and the politicial spectrum rather than the latter.  I'm sure plenty of people wish there was another way, but that's simply how it is.

Thus it really makes no sense for Malkin to attempt to make a connection between her hate mail and Williams, since 1.  she was receiving hate mail before all of this went down, and 2.  the ones that wrote her after the Williams incident to rant about being on the take probably didn't like her before the incident and still wouldn't even if the scandal never happened.

When I engage in political discussions on message boards on the internet with leftists, I expect to be called everything but a child of God, and true to form, I have been.  Uncle Tom, nigger, porch monkey, Bush jockrider, fascist, bootlicker, etc....and these are some of the nicer terms.   At first, it irked me, because they didn't know me or my background and they ignorantly assumed that to be conservative means to turn your back on black people and to want to be white.

Eventually, you realize that they have no basis in order to make these assusations and insults, and I have a choice in how to respond:  ignore them or expose them for the fools they are.  Sooner or later they'll either get tired of the silence or the bombs dropping over their heads and they'll retreat back into the cracks in the walls.  Standing around complaining about racial slurs being hurled at you only makes you appear weak and allows the ones who throw them to get some comfort in making you uncomfortable.

Regardless, Williams isn't the reason why Malkin will get more hate mail these days, and even if she gets more, so what?  Suck it up, get over it and continue to do what you've been doing.

Posted at 03:27 am by Expertise
Comments (1)  

Home




Friday, January 14, 2005
Self-righteousness comes home to roost.

On Monday night I talked about Criticism vs. Self-Righteousness, and I gave this fair warning:

It would help a few people, before they go on tirades about Williams's behavior, to recall any mistakes made in their life.  I'm sure all can think of a few.  The man has apologized, and it's not as if he has a history of such behavior.  It's time to break up the posse and move on.

Now, chalk it up to the fact that I didn't post this soon enough, or my blog viewership is so small that my messages don't spread wide enough.  But the message was something that people should have took heed of.

One of those people is Markos Zuniga, the owner of the Daily Kos.  On Friday, Kos commented on a passage by David Corn from The Nation.  Corn said:

"This happens all the time," he told me. "There are others." Really? I said. Other conservative commentators accept money from the Bush administration? I asked Williams for names. "I'm not going to defend myself that way," he said. The issue right now, he explained, was his own mistake. Well, I said, what if I call you up in a few weeks, after this blows over, and then ask you? No, he said.
And to this, Kos responds:

Until names are named, we can assume every conservative pundit is on the White House's payola rolls.

It's a shameful barb, and although he probably won't admit it, I bet it's one that Kos wishes he never made.  Yesterday the internet campaign leader of Howard Dean's 2004 presidential campaign, Zephyr Teachout of Zonkette, made a public omission of her own:

On Dean’s campaign, we paid Markos and Jerome Armstrong as consultants, largely in order to ensure that they said positive things about Dean. We paid them over twice as much as we paid two staffers of similar backgrounds, and they had several other clients.

While they ended up also providing useful advice, the initial reason for our outreach was explicitly to buy their airtime. To be very clear, they never committed to supporting Dean for the payment -- but it was very clearly, internally, our goal.

Now, Kos for the most part was being duped, and thought they really wanted him and Armstrong, who runs the MyDD blog, for technical support.  You can't fault him there.  He also put up a disclaimer, which said he was being paid to provide technical support to the campaign.

This isn't a question about ethics in the case of Kos, as he's pretty clear on that end.  However, now that we know there are leftists that are being paid by the politicans that they comment on, should we follow Kos's lead and assume that all of the left-wing commentators are being paid off as well?

So, what chu talkin bout, Willis?

Ha.  Maybe you guys will take caution in choosing your words when the next big story hits.

But hey, at least Kos will have his name in the news.  He'll be in tomorrow's Wall Street Journal.

Posted at 03:36 am by Expertise
Comments (3)  

Home




Next Page



   









Contact Me

If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:




rss feed

BLOGDRIVE
TEMPLATES

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

Blogdrive