Expertise's Politics and Sports Blog


Thursday, February 10, 2005
The Eagle Embarrassment.

Looking back, I can't recall any team that has been more of an embarrassment after losing a Super Bowl than the Philadelphia Eagles.  It was as if they planned all week to make a number of excuses and complaints once they lost the game.

First, we had Terrell Owens whining because he isn't loved like Brett Farve or Curt Schilling.  Aw.  There's no doubt that people should give Terrell Owens his just due.  I mean, the guy was playing with a broken leg and ripped ligaments that hasn't fully rehabbed.  That doesn't make TO the greatest athlete in the world, as some TO-loving propagandists have yelled, but still, it was a noble effort.  I never thought he was selfish, because he was realistically the offensive weapon that could keep that team in the game.

However, if TO wants to be appreciated and applauded the same way Brett and Curt are, then guess what?  You have to act like them all the time.  Last time I checked, Brett Farve didn't run out to midfield of Dallas Stadium and pose on the star after scoring a touchdown.  Curt doesn't rip his teammates and calls them homosexuals.  Brett doesn't complain to the press about not getting the ball enough when they are 13-1.  Until you change your attitude, you're not going to get the adulation you expect.  You have to do more than one achievement on one night to turn around all the animosity that you have built up in the last eight years.

Next, we had Hank Fraley and Freddie Mitchell saying McNabb was sick during the fourth quarter.  McNabb denied he was sick, just tired, and Freddie didn't call any plays inside the huddle.  Generally I would give McNabb the benefit of the doubt, but the fact is that SOMETHING was wrong with him, and getting beasted by Richard Seymour is as good of a reason as any.

I can see why McNabb didn't want to admit he was hurt/sick.  He didn't want to be seen as making excuses.  That's fine, but there should be some explanation other than "my bad".  And I don't see how Fraley and Mitchell felt disclosing it would make the loss look any better.

Speaking of Mitchell...

Does the man know any shame at all?  Does the man know how to shut his mouth?  His interview on ESPNRadio's "AllNight" last night makes him look like a total fool.  Blaming TO because you didn't get any looks from McNabb?  Dude, you're the FIFTH OPTION for that team.  McNabb looks to TO, Pink, West, and Smith before he even thinks about looking for you.  McNabb didn't go to you until the fourth quarter, a wide open pass for 11 yards.  Where was the belt then, Freddie?

And why would Freddie even mention the Patriots after that debacle?  Regardless of whether you got under their skin, the fact is that they used his words to motivate them to a Lombardi Trophy.  Meanwhile, Harrison and the boys have forgotten about him and are on to better things while he's still harping on them.

When Freddie is cut from the Eagles - and I believe he will as he's now embarrassed McNabb and TO in a matter of days, and shows no signs of shutting his mouth - and he's on that chopping block that is free agency, maybe then he'll realize how he should have kept his mouth shut.  I'm not holding my breath, tho.

The Eagles looked bad enough in losing the game, but days afterwards they've made themselves look a lot worse.  Andy Reid is a good coach, but if he can't keep egos in check during a run to the Super Bowl, what's going to happen when they lose games and come short in the future?  For the franchise's sake, they better hope they keep winning, or the Eagles will be in the same shape as the Sixers.

Posted at 02:50 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home




Wednesday, February 09, 2005
Under Construction.

I'm trying out some new layouts, in order to see if I can get a larger and brighter font.  So if things look a bit wacky, you know why.

Posted at 01:58 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home

Rumsfeld checks Tim Russert.

This is a rarity.  Tim Russert is used to making everyone else look bad.  But on Sunday's Meet the Press when he interviewed Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, he was one that sat in the hotseat.

It all started when Russert asked him about the now-infamous Q&A session in Iraq.  Just like other media outlets, as I discussed here, Rumsfeld response to a question about armor for tanks was taken out of context by Russert.

After Russert showed "selected" clips of Rumsfeld's response, here's what transpired:

SEC'Y RUMSFELD:  Yeah, but wait a minute.  Let me get into this a little bit.

MR. RUSSERT:  Sure.

SEC'Y RUMSFELD:  That was unfair and it was selectively taking out two sentences from a long exchange--there it is--that took place.  And when you suggested that that's how I answered that question, that is factually wrong.

MR. RUSSERT:  No, we...

SEC'Y RUMSFELD:  That is not how I answered that question.

MR. RUSSERT:  But, Mr. Secretary, it clearly represents the exchange and...

SEC'Y RUMSFELD:  It does not.

MR. RUSSERT:  All right.  What is missing?

SEC'Y RUMSFELD:  You want to hear the exchange?  There is it.  It's right here.  I'll read it to you.

MR. RUSSERT:  I just...

SEC'Y RUMSFELD:  If you're going to quote pieces of it, I'll give you the exchange.

Rumsfeld then read the WHOLE response.  Afterwards he said:

Now, that answer is totally different from picking out two lines.  And I think it's an unfair representation and it's exactly what some of the newspapers around the country did.  Now, let's go back to Susan Collins' comment, Senator Collins...
Rumsfeld is absolutely right.  Newspapers and other media outlets constantly misrepresented what Rumsfeld actually said and tried to make it seem as if he was being short and terse with the soldier.  The truth is that he gave a detailed answer, but the mainstream media was only concerned with two sentences that made what he said look worse than what it actually was.

Russert, for the first time, had to quickly change the subject.

Even then, some members of the media couldn't place Rumsfeld's statement in the proper context.  Greg Mitchell, the editor of Editor and Publisher, wrote about the incident today, and added this at the end (via Michelle Malkin):

The Pentagon chief predicted that by mid-February "there will not be a vehicle moving around in Iraq outside of a protected compound with American soldiers in it that does not have an appropriate level of armor."

But Russert replied: "Which is a pretty dramatic change, because Newsweek had said that, of the 19,000 Humvees in the Iraqi theater, according to the Army's latest numbers, only a quarter were fully armored. So the fact is that Specialist Wilson's question in front of his troops in which he was cheered was helpful in getting people to truly focus and respond to this. Fair?"

To which Rumsfeld responded: "Well, you saw my answer."

Once again, you would think "Well, you saw my answer" was all Rumsfeld said, as if he had no reply.  Here's what Rumsfeld actually said:

MR. RUSSERT:  Which is a pretty dramatic change, because Newsweek had said that, of the 19,000 Humvees in the Iraqi theater, according to the Army's latest numbers, only a quarter were fully armored.  So the fact is that Specialist Wilson's question in front of his troops in which he was cheered was helpful in getting people to truly focus and respond to this.  Fair?

SEC'Y RUMSFELD:  I didn't criticize his question.  I thanked him for his question.

MR. RUSSERT:  No, but is that a fair statement?

SEC'Y RUMSFELD:  Well, you saw my answer.  We'd already been focusing on it hard.  I mean, I answered it by saying we had teams of people in Washington working on it, General Whitcomb was working on it.

Rumsfeld's full response sure changes things, doesn't it?  How would Wilson's answer "change things" when this had already been in the works for months?  Rather, Mitchell wanted to make it seem that Wilson's question from the start made that much difference in things, when it really didn't (or at least there's no evidence that it had from Rumsfeld's interview with Russert).

I'm not advocating journalists provide entire passages quoting people or writings, but I don't think it's asking too much for them to quote them in the proper context, even if it means taking up a LITTLE more space in the newspapers and in the broadcasts.  I think accuracy should always trump being "piffy", as Bill O'Reilly would say.

Mitchell is taking email inquiries about the issue at gmitchell@editorandpublisher.com.  I plan to email him tonight about the distortion of both the Q&A and his distortion of Rumsfeld's response.

Posted at 12:28 am by Expertise
Comments (2)  

Home




Tuesday, February 08, 2005
Meet Cosby's accuser.



Ha.  This gets better by the moment.

So, how long will it take for The Black Commentator and other afrocentric-socialist websites to try to make the connection between Cosby's self-righteousness - which they will depict as conservative leanings, if not call him a Republican outright - and his new-found jungle fever?

Eh.  Not long at all.

UPDATE:  Via Booker, The Toronto Sun cites sources that say she has audio tapes of telephone conversations between the accuser and Cosby.  According to their sources, she has already given the tapes to Montgomery County's DA.  That doesn't sound too good.

Posted at 08:34 am by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home




Monday, February 07, 2005
The Patriots are the champs.

Was there any question about who would come home with the Lombardi Trophy?  I didn't question it, and anyone would knew a lick about the NFL wouldn't have either.

That didn't mean the Patriots made it easy to win, or easy to watch.  This was probably the worst coaching performance by the three-headed monster: Belichick, Weis, and Crennel.  Weis made the playcalling very ultraconservative, and didn't take any chances downfield.  After they went up by ten, it seemed as if the offense felt the game was over and that they didn't need to play anymore. 

Crennel really looked bad, IMO, especially when he called for man-to-man coverage and had no one covering deep on the huge touchdown pass McNabb connected to Greg Lewis with less than two minutes left in the game.   It didn't help that he had the corners play soft on the Eagles receivers in the 3rd quarter scoring drive that tied the game at 14.  Believe me; if the Pats would have somehow lost that game, even on a fluke, everyone would have been crapping on Crennel today.

Lucky for them, McNabb was terrible.  If you would have told me that NE would only win by three points, yet McNabb was picked three times I would have thought you were crazy.  The truth is, McNabb could have had a couple more picked off as well, as it seemed as if the accurate passes were the ones thrown to NE's secondary.  I think it's a testament to the improvement of the Eagles receiver corp that they were able to make big catches that were often overthrown or thrown behind them.  And the blame for the horrible clock management - not only in the fourth quarter but before halftime as well - goes to him as well as Andy Reid.

There were some bright spots.  Deion Branch, who was the Super Bowl MVP, and Terrell Owens stole the show.  Branch bruised the Eagles secondary for a SB record-tying 11 catches for 133 yards.  If it wasn't for him, the Pats would have been in serious trouble in this game.  And Terrell Owens definitely showed he is the best WR in the league, catching nine passes for 122 yards on a bad leg that for all intents and purposes isn't fully rehabilitated.  (It should be noted that Branch missed most of the season, and was almost placed on IR.  I'm sure the Pats are glad they didn't.)

Philly's defense kept them in the game to the end, making great stops and never allowing Corey Dillon and Kevin Faulk to stay consistent with the running game.  That surprised me, because Dillon generally does his damage in the fourth quarter by breaking tackles, consistently getting those six yard runs, and killing the clock.  The fact is that the defense gave the Eagles more than enough chances to win this game, but the offense - with the exception of TO - was abysmal.

Now that I've talked about the game, let's now talk about Freddie Mitchell.

I said it like that because Freddie Mitchell wasn't in the game.  One catch for 11 yards.  That's absolutely sad.  I'm listening to Jim Rome and the Clones rip into him throughout the show today, but let's be real...you knew he wouldn't produce anything.  He never has!  And with TO in the game you knew McNabb isn't looking at him as an option unless everyone else is covered and he is WIDE open.

And another thing:  Mitchell called out Pats cornerback Rodney Harrison, yet Harrison had more catches than Mitchell did.  Harrison had two picks and a sack last night, and would have been MVP if it wasn't for Branch's performance.  This will go down as one of the biggest flops in sports history, and Mitchell deserves every bit of the criticism he gets from here on out.  I wouldn't be surprised if the Eagles cut him in the offseason.

Mitchell wasn't the only one; Todd Pinkston was a joke too.  Pink actually had a great first half, catching four passes for 80 yards including two tough catches to help the Eagles get on the scoreboard in the second quarter.  But he was "injured" in the second half, and never finished the game. 

The injury?  Cramps.  That's right; you're playing in the SUPER BOWL and during the first half was putting up great numbers and helping your team move the ball down the field, yet you are going to leave the game because you have cramps.  I tell ya; the Super Bowl is one helluva time to go on your period.  People were trashing Chuck Badnarik last week for claiming today's football players were soft and hoping the Eagles lose so the 1960 team would be the only Eagles team to win the championship, but Pink helped cement that assertion.

All in all, the Patriots deserve praise for what they've done.  Regardless if Belichick can get it done next year without his coaching staff (Weis has been hired to be the head coach at Notre Dame, Cremmel will be the head coach at Cleveland), no one can deny their place in NFL history.  Rest assured, Brady and Belichick have their spots prepared at the Hall when they hang up the cleats (or the clipboard if you're Belichick).

Posted at 01:37 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home




Friday, February 04, 2005
The Super Bowl review.

It's a shame that this year isn't anything like last year.

Last year the Super Bowl wasn't drowned out by egos, and people actually focused on the game.  Now we hear even the most stupid questions being asked about guys who will probably make little to no impact in the game itself.  Hence, that's what I'm here for.  Let's talk about the game.

The focal point of this game is the Eagles offense.  They have a lot of pressure on them, regardless of whether TO plays in this game or not.  It's not because I don't think they can put points on the board, because they will.  But will they put enough points on the board to keep this game within single digits?  That's the question.

As I stated during conference championship week, New England's offense plays to the level of their opponents just enough to win decisively.  They don't have to put 30-40 points on the board every week, although they could if they wanted to.  Brady showed in the Steelers game that he can air it out when he wants to, and if you don't bring pressure on him he will make you pay for it.  And in the fourth quarter they'll make sure they're ahead by two scores so they can simply hand it off to Corey Dillon and suck time off the clock.

The Eagles have to score, and score often.  If they try to make their move in the fourth, it'll be too late.  If they wait until the third, it'll be too late.  Brian Westbrook will have to have a big day, and McNabb has to make plays with his feet; NOT to scramble out the backfield, because I guarantee you Bruschi will be spying in the middle of the field waiting to kill McNabb as soon as he crosses the line of scrimmage.  He has to give his guys time to get open, much like he did against Atlanta two weeks ago.
On the other side of the ball, Philly has got to keep New England's receivers in check.  Brady has a quick release, and his accuracy is second to no one, so it's going to be hard for that secondary to break up plays.  However, they can't let those receivers get into open field, nor can they allow them to get any YAC.  If I were Reid, I'd try some cover 2 man's and stay out of zone coverage.  Brady will rip the Eagles apart if they try to play zone all game.

Their best bet is to keep Dillon grounded and to pressure Brady to make mistakes.  That's easier said than done, because I think the offensive line will be and always has been the difference for the Patriots.  For that reason alone, I expect Jeremiah Trotter and the linebackers to have a relatively quiet day on Sunday.

Regardless, here's how I think it'll go:

Reid will try the same approach that most coaches do against New England:  Ignore Brady, let him pass as much as he wants, stop the run, and beat their defense.  And it won't work.  If you're going to beat New England, you're going to have to beat Brady.  Dillon is only the finisher; he isn't going to win them the game.  But considering the circus and hoopla surrounding the loudmouths on that team and the fact that New England wakes up and goes to sleep pissed off, I don't think they are ready for the Pats.

McNabb will have his receivers taken out of the game pretty early.  Pinkston won't be a factor and will be beaten up.  Mitchell will be slapped around.  TO is only dangerous with two legs, and I doubt if he'll be anything other than a slot receiver.  Hence, that only leaves Westbrook.  And placing the linebackers on Westbrook will probably end any real threat he poses.  McNabb will use his feet much like he did in Atlanta, but that's only going to work for a few plays before he gets popped one good time.  Expect a game that's the equivalent of last year's Carolina/Philly NFC title game.

Meanwhile, Brady will continue to be Tom Brady; sit in the pocket, allow that force field known as his offensive line to keep everything out, and place the ball right into his receivers' numbers.  A couple of air outs and this one will be in the bag.

As Limbaugh said today, it's not whether or not Bellichek will win this one, but how much he wants to win by.  Philly isn't scaring the Pats by being the champion in the worst conference since the 1970's.  And all the necktalk by TO and Mitchell just made that chip on their shoulder just a little bit bigger.

I hope Wilma McNabb loaded up on the chunky soup this week, because McNabb and TO are gonna need it.  Mitchell too.  This won't be close like the Pats' other two Bowls; I got the Pats in a romp.

Posted at 03:36 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home

Man bites dog.

My childhood days were spent in Hyde County, North Carolina, which is just off the famed Outer Banks.  Generations of my family have lived there, through both slavery and freedom.

One of the historical points in during those times was back in 1967 in Middletown, in which I went into a little bit here.  At the time, the schools were being forced to integrate (but black people in the county fought it.  If you wanna know more about it, read this book) and racial tensions were at an all-time high.

The Klan had a building in Middletown where they had their rallies.  There had been several incidents between the black teenagers - one of them being my dad - who had brushes with the Klan, and people could see it was going to come to a boiling point.  My dad and his friends/family were hiding their guns at my uncle's house, and the Klan were trying to intimidate black people in the area by spreading leaflets and spraypainting houses.

Well, one night my cousin and some friends of his were out riding around in Middletown, and the road just happened to go right by the Klan's building, and one of dem dere good ole boys decided to get that ole shotgun out and shoot into the back window of the car.

No one was hurt.  But it didn't take but a hour or so to round up a posse to take a trip on the Klan house.

By the time the county police got there, I think two were shot, one on each side.  No one was killed, though, and most importantly, the Klan was never seen in that county again.  My father wasn't there, because he had went with one of my uncles to Manteo that afternoon.  For some reason, he never mentioned all of that stuff to me.  I had found out about the book, and mentioned some of the stuff I had read.  I guess he never thought it was that important. 

However, I did.  It was a perfect example of how citizens in a community took things into their own hands to run the cess pool of society out of their county.  

So imagine how I felt when I read this (from Free Iraqi):

Citizens of Al Mudiryiah were subjected to an attack by several militants today who were trying to punish the residents of this small town for voting in the election last Sunday.
The citizens responded and managed to stop the attack, kill 5 of the attackers, wounded 8 and burned their cars.
3 citizens were injured during the fire exchange. The Shiekh of the tribe to whom the 3 wounded citizens belong demanded more efforts from the government to stop who he described as "Salafis".

I bet those maggots will think twice before they go back into that town again.  And that's what all Iraqis have to do in order to get rid of terrorism in their country; simply fight back.  They don't all have to be combative, but they should cooperate and target areas where these people are giving these terrorists aid and sanctuary, whether it's businesses or residences.  Terrorists can't hide if there aren't any hiding places.

Here's hoping there are more stories like these popping up.  Iraqis are learning what this so-called "insurgency" is about; they aren't rebels, they're invaders.  They are trying to take over the country, and a good number of them aren't even from Iraq to begin with.  They want to take over the country and place the Iraqis in even harsher conditions than Saddam ruled them under.  Thus, the sooner the Iraqis start rooting these worms out from under the rocks they're under, the better.

Posted at 02:23 am by Expertise
Comments (1)  

Home




Thursday, February 03, 2005
Dishing on Andrew Sullivan.

I don't get it, so maybe one of you can explain it to me.

Andrew Sullivan's blog, "The Dish" is one of the more popular sites on the blogosphere.  His huge reader base has been built on his reputation as a writer for Time Magazine, The London Guardian, and Free Republic.  From what I know his blog is consistently in the top 10 of the "Ecosystem", which ranks the most frequented and linked blogs in the blogosphere.

So Andrew decides last year that he'd start a fundraising drive in order to cover his blogging expenses.  He asks people to donate to help him with the upkeep of his site.  He collected over $80,000 on the first one, and some accounts have said altogether (he's done at least two) that he's collected over $200,000 from his readers.

Once those numbers came out, I guess it was only natural for people to jump up and rip him for it.  Michelle Malkin, INDC Journal, Tim Blair and others gave him hell for it, saying he's being deceitful because the money needed to keep up his site isn't even a fraction of how much he collected.  They're also accusing him of using the money donated in order to take his hiatus from the site, including a trip to Europe.

As I stated in the comments section on Malkin's blog, it would be one thing if Sullivan told readers that they HAD to give, or how much they had to give in order to keep the site running.  He didn't.  Also, you have to consider the fact that Sullivan has a very large following on that site.  Even a small portion of his readers giving, say, $20 dollars each could amount to thousands of dollars.

The fact is, people gave to his site because they liked his work, and they wanted him to continue it.  If they didn't care, they wouldn't have given anything.  It would be one thing if Sullivan stated that he was giving this money to a charity, or for health care of him or loved ones, or for something else.  He didn't.  It was for his blog, and it wasn't as if the people giving the money thought they were going to give a refund once he raised enough, or at least they shouldn't have.

This simply amounts to envy by several bloggers, many whom did not contribute to Sullivan's site and thus have no business in the situation.  They are the ones that end up looking bad, not Sullivan.  Simply put, the money isn't in their pocket, so they want to make sure it's out of Sullivan's pockets as well.  If they aren't getting it, others shouldn't have it either.

Posted at 11:13 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home

I'm now using Trackbacks.

That's right.  World domination is finally within my grasp.

Speaking of wanting something in my grasp:



Can someone give me a trip to Kenya for my birthday?

It's in June, so you have four months.  Someone in the blogosphere surely can hook a brotha up, right? :-D

   - While I'm thinking about it, congrats to Wake for whupping Duke, and subsequently placing the Tarheels back on the top of the food chain.  Damned shame that we can't pay you back for the game from Jan 15th until the ACC Tournament, but don't worry...it's just a delay in the inevitable.  We'll be ready.

Posted at 03:33 am by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home




Wednesday, February 02, 2005
Sports notes.

    - Andy Reid must have put the lockdown on Freddie Mitchell's mouth.  First, Freddie complained that he didn't get his own podium for media day (someone obviously didn't give him the note that TO is playing on Sunday, which makes him the fourth option behind TO, Westbrook, and Pinkston.  Hell; possibly behind activated TE Jeff Thomason, too).  Eagles TE L.J. Smith stated Reid told the boys to chill out or face repercussions.  It's looks like it's taking a toll on Mitchell's mood, as Yahoo Sports' Dan Wetzel said Mitchell had a terrible Media Day on Tuesday.

    - Quote of the year:

"I can say - in response to the caller from Pittsburgh - because I do listen to the show, that Freddie Mitchell has 22 catches.  "He's not a premier receiver. My son in flag football had 22 catches. That's the level he's on. He should keep his mouth shut and catch more balls than fourth-and-26. Score with the ball. Don't catch somebody else's fumble. Be a playmaker, not a player.

- Steve Smith, when asked about Freddie Mitchell on James Brown's show on Sporting News Radio.

    - It's rumored that Emmitt Smith will retire tomorrow.  I was never a Cowboys fan, but I did think Emmitt was a great rusher and will be considered one of the all-time greats.  I did become a fan of his in his last two seasons, although I kinda wished it would have been Barry Sanders breaking the all-time rushing record, and not him.  He wasn't the quickest running back ever, but he definitely was one of the toughest rushers the league has seen.

    - Donald Driver told the media today that he expects Brett Farve to retire as well.  Not a good idea Driver; let Farve tell the media that himself.  You're only putting yourself on the spot if Brett does return for another season.

    - I forgot to mention this....after several mediocre years under Matt Doherty, UNC under Roy Williams has been giving out asswhuppins and lollipops.  Well on Saturday when they faced Virginia, they left the lollipops at home.  As a replacement, they might have handed Pete Gilliam a pink slip.  Two embarrassing back-to-back losses to two hated rivals (they lost to Va Tech the game before that one) can't be sitting too happy with UVA's athletic department.

The problem?  Gilliam's got six years remaining on his contract.  SIX.  The alumnis are rumored to be trying to raise money to buy it out.  Who knows; maybe they'll have a bake sale or something. *shrugs*

   - Congrats to Serena Williams, as she finally showed some heart and pulled out a victory despite being injured to win the Australia Open.  I'm sure I'm not the only one that wishes she'd concentrate more on tennis and less on fashion, especially if it's producing crap like this and this.

Do better.

   - I like Tony Kornheiser on Pardon the Interruption.  I wasn't a huge fan of his show on ESPNRadio, as it seemed as if he wanted to talk about everything but sports and for some odd reason ESPN hardly doesn't take callers, which I feel is a talk radio show's best quality (Unless you're Limbaugh, but Limbaugh's show has qualities that no other talker can emulate).  All in all, I think Tony is an alright guy.

But he is an ass for this, as he just trashes Jacksonville for no reason whatsoever.  I could see it if he was a writer for a Super Bowl team and he was trashing the opposing team's city, which is a sports media custom for the Super Bowl.  But Washington isn't going to the Super Bowl (and won't anytime soon) and Jacksonville is hosting it, not playing in it.  Kornheiser comes off as a prima donna for this.

In a post on Sunday about the image of the media I cited an article from Slate.com that talks about how sportswriters featured on ESPN are now uber-celebrities at the expense of the quality of their columns for their respected newspapers.  The article is called Unpardonable Interruptions:  How Television Killed the Newspaper Sports Column, ironically written by ESPN Magazine contributor Stephen Rodrick.

I highly suggest reading the column, as it's a great read.  Kornheiser and ESPN basketball analyst/Philadelphia Inquirer sportswriter Stephen A. Smith - who's got to be the most obnoxious sports personality today - blasted him for the article, but when you read mess like that Kornheiser's Jacksonville column, you can't help but agree with Roderick.

I wonder if Roderick's going to work with ESPN again after writing this article.  As he noted with LA sports columist T.J. Simers, and as I recall the complete 180's Tom Jackson and Chris Berman did after the Limbaugh incident as well as Flip Saunders after the Detroit/Indiana brawl, going against the company grain isn't something the stiffnecks at ESPN take kindly towards.

   - I'll have my Super Bowl analysis up by Friday.

Posted at 04:04 am by Expertise
Leave a message  

Home




Next Page



   









Contact Me

If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:




rss feed

BLOGDRIVE
TEMPLATES

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

Blogdrive