 |
|
Saturday, April 02, 2005
Final Four Showdown II: North Carolina vs. Michigan State
Final Four Showdown II: North Carolina vs. Michigan State
It's time. Winner takes on Illinois.
Carolina must neutralize MSU's speed and athleticism by playing tough perimeter defense against their backcourt. MSU needs Paul Davis to have the game of his life, and force McCants and Felton to have a tough night from the field.
Tipoff will start in about another half hour or so.
8:53: Tipoff starts, and Carolina's already got two fouls in the game. However, Michigan State seems a little off balance at the defensive end, and if that happens throughout, Carolina will score 90 tonight. Tied at four.
9:00: MSU's quickness is getting the best of Carolina on the offensive end, but their post game so far isn't working. Meanwhile, May hasn't been able to establish anything yet in this game, and it's important to get him started early, just like he did against Wisconsin in the Elite Eight. 8-6 MSU.
9:03: North Carolina at it's finest: making plays that no other team can possibly make. A huge alley by McCants wakes up the crowd. Next time down court (after a block forces the turnover), Felton gets a great pass to Noel for a nice dunk. Maybe they can deal with MSU's athleticism. The only problem I see so far is that they're allowing MSU more attempts under the basket than they should. 13-12 UNC.
9:12: If you like an athletic contest, this will be the game for you. Beautiful plays by both teams. Sean May hit a basket in the paint and gets the foul, but misses the ft. He's still a bit rusty, and takes a break on the bench. A McCants three makes it a four point lead with less than 10 left in the half.
9:21: MSU's rebounding is dogging UNC, which I'm sure surprises a lot of people. Just as soon Carolina gets some kind of leverage, MSU comes roaring back and starts hitting. Sean May also seems fatigued by the pace of the game. A 7-0 run puts MSU back on top, 27-25 with 5:39 left in the half.
9:36: MSU is taking advantage of UNC defensive flops. Carolina is getting some success inside, but their defense is going to be the death of them. Two three pointers by MSU makes it a 35-29 ballgame with 2 minutes left in the half.
9:39: Carolina's using their athleticism to cut this lead. But the missed-shot-and-done thing is getting tired, and Carolina needs some rebounds. They need to stop shooting the trey, as they've been cold from beyond the arc for a good part of the half. MSU leads 38-33.
9:40: Halftime. Carolina's shooting went cold at the end of the first half, and MSU outscored them 18-8 to close it. Their rebounding is also surprisingly horrible, and they are getting outhustled on both ends of the court by MSU. They need to come out fast and set the pace in the second half.
MSU is playing smart by using their bench effectively and keeping a fresh man on Sean May. May went 2-8 in that half. That isn't going to work. Carolina's going to need him to produce in the second half on both ends to pull this game out.
10:05: Second half starts, and UNC starts out well. May gets a good shot in the paint, and a turnover gives them a 3-1 fast break to get another one. An Jawad Williams alley gives UNC the lead and a 6-0 run, 39-38.
10:14: MSU and UNC are going toe-to-toe. Carolina seems to come close to go on a run, but then MSU comes up with the needed basket. However, Carolina seems to be asserting itself on the boards, as they're grabbing much needed rebounds. Poor ballhandling though, as they've turned the ball over on a steal twice in the second half. Jackie Manuel has four fouls and has to sit, but David Noel has great athleticism, so he should be able to hang in there with these speed demons. 53-49 UNC.
10:25: Michigan State has gone cold, and they're not been able to produce in the last few minutes. They have gotten plenty of open looks, but they're missing each one and UNC is taking advantage of it. Carolina's doing a much better job on the boards as well, and not allowing MSU a second chance like they did throughout the first half.
Carolina led by as much as 11; they lead by nine now with 11:35 left.
10:33: Carolina sees blood. They are doing a helluva good job on defense, and MSU can't hit a lick. And now they are pushing the ball down the court and making quick baskets. MSU surprisingly can't hang and execute with this tempo, but then again they haven't played a team that can score like this. Carolina leads 69-56 with nine minutes left.
10:40: I can't believe I'm saying this, but Carolina has ran Michigan State ragged. They look tired, they're playing sloppy, and Carolina's making it look easy right now. Considering MSU hasn't shown a penchant for putting up huge numbers all year I don't see an Illinois-type comeback right now. Carolina ties their biggest lead at 15, 73-58 with 6:53 to go.
10:47: This is a tale of two halves. Carolina's playing the best defense I've seen them play all year. MSU is shooting only 32% from the field. They're still fighting though, but UNC isn't letting up. May gets the basket to put Carolina up by 14 with less than four mins to go.
10:55: Oh man. Carolina's now showing off with back-to-back alleys by May and Williams, respectively. You can stick a fork in this one. 83-68 with 2:00 left.
- Well I thought the Wisconsin game was impressive, but this one was definitely better. HUGE adjustments in the second half allowed Carolina to dominate the boards, get May active, and simply turn this into a sprinting contest, and no one does it better. And the funny thing is, Jawad Williams led the team on both ends of the court through both halves. Not May, and not McCants or Felton.
If you told me at halftime that Carolina would be able to turn the game around like that, I would have thought you were crazy. But they did, and it started at the defensive end.
If they carry that defensive aggression into the national championship game, they'll finish that Big Ten sweep with a national championship.
North Carolina is going to the National Championship Game, 87-71.
Party on Franklin Street Monday night.
Posted at 08:20 pm by Expertise
Link Me
Home
Final Four Showdown: Illinois vs. Louisville
Final Four Showdown: Illinois vs. Louisville
Let get things started.
Louisville's bringing in the better coach and better front court, while Illinois is bringing the nation's best record and the best backcourt in the nation.
Tipoff's in a few minutes.
6:12: Illinois starts out doing what they do best; working the perimeter. In fact, they never feed it inside the arc in the first two possessions. They hit their first two threes, but Louisville gets an inside layup and a three as well. 8-5 Illi.
6:20: Louisville's plan is clear: work the paint. Play the post game, and control the boards. The problem is, they're leaving themselves open the fast break transition, and Dee Brown made them pay for it with a three on the baseline. 13-9 Illinois.
6:31: Illinois goes on a scoring drought, but Louisville simply can't capitalize. The Cards are trying to execute too many complicated baskets in the paint, and can't hit anything outside. They get within two, but Illinois's fast break once again gets them a basket. Before that score Illinois went three minutes without one, but still maintained the lead. 19-15 Illinois with 9 minutes left in the half.
6:37: Illinois is dead cold now, and they can't get anything going. Meanwhile, Louisville still controlling the boards on both ends. But they are getting a little too aggressive, and are racking up the fouls. An O'Bannon three ties this game at 22 with 6:39 left in the half.
6:45: Dee Brown is hot, and Francisco Garcia isn't. In fact, Garcia is 1-7 from the field, which is hurting Louisville. Dee Brown hit another three to regain their lead. Louisville answers, but here's another three by Illi's Jack Ingram to lead by four with less than four minutes to go in the half.
6:53: If Louisville ever starts hitting baskets, they'll take control of this game, because they're able to keep grabbing rebounds. Lucky for them, the officials are calling the game their way.
Luther Head gets wide open for a three, which gives Illinois their biggest lead. Louisville gets a three point play on the other end, but other than that there isn't any considerable execution on either end.
Halftime. Illinois 31, Louisville 28. Louisville can't hit only one from the field in six minutes and expect to win this game.
7:25: Both teams come out blasting, as O'Bannon comes out of the locker room with a three, and follows that with two fts to give Louisville their first lead of the game.
But the spotlight then turns to Illi's Roger Powell, who hits a three, then comes back the next possession and dunks an offensive rebound off of a three pter he missed, and then hits another basket in the paint. Someone btter get a hold of him. Louisville is still hanging tough, though. Illi leads 38-37.
7:31: Powell keeps blasting, as he's hit Illinois's last 12 of 14 points. I'm sure no one saw that. I'm starting to like the offensive pace of both teams in this half. Luther Head comes alive with a three. Louisville needs to step up their perimeter defense. 48-44 Illinois with 12:08 left.
7:40: Louisville isn't as effective on the boards with this zone as they were in the first half. A few times there wasn't anyone under the basket trying to grab a rebound, and Illinois has had more sucess in the interior. Louisville improves their shot selection, and can slash the boards. Roger Powell is dominating the second half though. 52-49 Illini.
7:45: Luther Head comes alive, hitting back to back from downtown. Petino takes a timeout. Methinks that's the last time we'll see a zone from Louisville in this game. Illinois has their biggest lead, 58-49 with less than seven minutes left in the game.
7:51: The clock is now running out on Louisville, as they have went scoreless in the last four and a half minutes. This isn't a team that can put points on the board in a quick amount of time. That's what they might have to do in order to get out of this margin. 61-51 Illinois with 5:17 left.
8:00: Luther Head is turning the lights out, but Louisville isn't giving up hope yet. It will take a strong defensive presence for them from here on out to come back from this deficit, and that's something we really haven't seen from them today.
If it was up to me, no college basketball team would ever play zone in the NCAA tournament. I haven't seen an effective one yet. Illinois leads comfortably after leading by as much of 13, 64-55 with 3:11 left.
8:07: Well, you can't go on scoring droughts throughout the game like Louisville did and think you're going to win a basketball game of any kind. It wasn't like Illinois put a ton of points on the board, or that they played great defense. Louisville just couldn't put the ball in the hole. Just way too many off shots throughout the game.
Meanwhile, Illinois stepped up and made adjustments, and that allowed Roger Powell and Luther Head to control the second half. Once the 10:00 mark came, Louisville should have just walked out of the arena, because their performance was simply awful.
End of the game, and Illinois advances to the National Championship Game, 72-57.
North Carolina vs. Michigan State is next. Click here to go to that post, which will be liveblogged as well.
Posted at 06:01 pm by Expertise
Link Me
Home
.
1920-2005.
Posted at 04:56 pm by Expertise
Link Me
Home
Final Four liveblogging.
I will be all over it.
So if you're at work but near a computer, stop on by. More than likely I'll update every ten minutes after tipoff. Even if you're watching it, stop in and take a look after the game to see how I called it, and don't be afraid to comment whether you agree or not.
I'll be ready. Will you?
Posted at 12:39 am by Expertise
Link Me
Home
Friday, April 01, 2005
The Pope.

(Source: AP/Yahoo)
I'm not a Catholic, but I haven't known another pope in my lifetime. In fact, I was born four months before he became pope.
He is more than just a religious leader. He is one of the most influential leaders of global politics, and he's traveled all over the world. He stood up against Communism in his native country, Poland. Of course, there's several times he's disagreed with American policies, but he's always been a man of principle and of conviction. Just as I stated when Ronald Reagan died, this is a man who's lived a full life and deserves all of the blessings that are to be bestowed upon him in the afterlife.
When you look men like these, it can make you feel guilty, because those men oftentimes have done more good in one day than most of us do all of our lives. The people they touch, the hope they've brought to the hopeless is unparalled. You see thousands of people around the world holding vigils for the Pope, and then you say to yourself, "What have I done today?"
There have indeed been some men that aren't deserving of the praise they get in life or death. But Pope John Paul II isn't one of them. May his pain be light as he ends his majestic journey through life.
Posted at 04:28 pm by Expertise
Link Me
Home
Washington Post: Berger shredded documents.
Washington Post: Berger shredded documents.
I was going to add this as an update to my previous Berger post, but this was too important to go unseen on my front page.
The Washington Post has the inside scoop of Sandy Berger's criminal act. As part of the plea bargain, Sandy Berger admitted this:
Rather than misplacing or unintentionally throwing away three of the five copies he took from the archives, as the former national security adviser earlier maintained, he shredded them with a pair of scissors late one evening at the downtown offices of his international consulting business.
The document, written by former National Security Council terrorism expert Richard A. Clarke, was an "after-action review" prepared in early 2000 detailing the administration's actions to thwart terrorist attacks during the millennium celebration. It contained considerable discussion about the administration's awareness of the rising threat of attacks on U.S. soil.
Archives officials have said previously that Berger had copies only, and that no original documents were lost. It remains unclear whether Berger knew that, or why he destroyed three versions of a document but left two other versions intact. Officials have said the five versions were largely similar, but contained slight variations as the after-action report moved around different agencies of the executive branch. The question is, how different were the variations? Something interesting had to be on those documents for Berger to shred them. Of course, we won't know what that is. So much for it being an "honest mistake".
And what will Berger get for all of this? A slap on the wrist:
Under terms negotiated by Berger's attorneys and the Justice Department, he has agreed to pay a $10,000 fine and accept a three-year suspension of his national security clearance. Not surprised, but very disappointed. Berger should be behind bars, and should never receive national security clearance ever again.
I don't see why the Justice Department accepted a plea to begin with. Berger was obviously guilty, and they were never going to see those missing documents again. So what did the government get out of this?
I suppose Hindrocket's rant last night was right on the money.
UPDATE: I've been Instalanched. Instapundit readers - or if you're being referred from somewhere else, as I've done quite a few trackbacks this morning - welcome, and I hope you'll click the "home" link at the bottom of the post and look at some of the other posts I've written this week. Maybe some of you will become regular readers.
Previous posts:
1. Sandy Berger is busted.
Posted at 07:38 am by Expertise
Link Me
Home
Thursday, March 31, 2005
Sandy Berger pleads guilty today.
Sandy Berger pleads guilty today.
Well, at least there is one bright thing to happen in an otherwise sad day. Clinton's former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger will plead guilty to taking classified documents from the National Archives. He's expected to appear in federal court Friday.
I discussed this story last summer (see " Sandy Berger is busted" from my best posts on the sidebar). Even to this day Berger has not brought back some of the materials that he stole from the National Archives last summer. Berger took the notes and documents and placed them into his pockets and pants, which bore the name of the scandal, "TrouserGate". At the time, Berger was an advisor to John Kerry.
Now I'm not stupid; it's very doubtful that Berger ever serves a lick of time in jail. I want to know exactly what he took, however. According to the AP, Berger took information "related" to a 2000 report on how the Clinton Administration reacted to terrorism prior to the millenium bombings. I've always thought there was more to this story than we were being told.
Finally, the AP snuck this little tidbit in:
Many Democrats, including former President Clinton, suggested politics were behind disclosure of the probe only days before the release of the Sept. 11 commission report, which Republicans feared would be a blow to President Bush's re-election campaign. Of course, this was nothing but a hollow accusation, but why should that stop the AP from mentioning it anyway?
Posted at 08:19 pm by Expertise
Link Me
Home
Schiavo dies.
But let's get one thing straight; the courts killed Terri Schiavo.
She didn't say she wanted to die, she didn't write she wanted to die, and there was nothing but hearsay evidence on the part of her "husband", his brother, and his brother's wife that she wanted to die. She didn't kill herself.
Thus, the courts killed her. If you had placed the same type of evidence in a court trial, you wouldn't get a jury in the world to convict the defendant. But, it was enough to kill an innocent woman.
Posted at 02:59 pm by Expertise
Link Me
Home
Poll: Most Americans don't have a clue.
Poll: Most Americans don't have a clue.
The Associated Press reported last night that most Americans feel no nation should have nuclear weapons, including the United States.
Well, that has to suck for Iran, China, North Korea, France, Great Britain, Russia, etc. After all, the polls have spoken, so that means they have to get rid of them now. I'm sure Bush will announce his plan to get rid of our nukes by the end of this week. Israel will have to give up theirs too, leaving them even more vulnerable in the Middle East.
But seriously folks, what's the point of conducting these polls? The media take them for face value, as if the standard poll taker knows precisely how dangerous our foreign rivals are. Even if they did, it will do nothing to change the global political landscape. Despots don't care about the concerns of the masses; that's what made them despots in the first place.
This is the continuation of a trend that places public opinion polls over laws, policies, and principles. Ignore the fact that these questions are often loaded, and are conducted by media groups themselves (this poll was conducted by the AP) for a second. The media, among others, think public policy should reflect the opinion polls. Too bad it doesn't work that way.
There is only one true poll, and that's an election. That's when you actually find out which policies the people support, and which policies they don't support. Everything else is just a false-face for the true voice of the people.
Posted at 05:48 am by Expertise
Link Me
Home
Wednesday, March 30, 2005
Anomyous sources screw Claybourn.
Anomyous sources screw Claybourn.
Last night Josh Claybourn admitted he may have been hoaxed on a story he broke Friday fingering one of the staffers from Harry Reid's office:
Late Friday evening I posted the accusations of four supposed Senate staffers who claimed a Democratic aide had distributed the "GOP" talking points memo. I now have reason to believe that in unraveling a hoax I was hoaxed myself. I haven't been able to confirm a Sen. Reid aide was the source and barring more conclusive evidence I have removed the accused's name from the original post out of fairness and accuracy. Those who made the accusations are nowhere to be found. Sen. Reid's office labels the accusation "completely ridiculous" and Sen. Santorum's office would not officially confirm or deny it, saying the investigation was "up to you, the bloggers, and the media."
I'm disturbed and upset, both with those who anonymously made the accusation and myself for posting it without more judicious restraint. Inevitably someone will accuse me of hypocrisy and that's a fair criticism. But I have retracted the sloppy reporting on my part and am willing to note the errors; that is much more than ABC or the Washington Post can say. Of course, I mentioned this tidbit in an earlier thread. I was a bit skeptical as well, stating more information pointing to the Reid staffer was needed in order to prove he was the author. However, I was willing to give Claybourn the benefit of the doubt, and I still do now. It was a mistake. A bad mistake, but a mistake nonetheless.
Hopefully he'll take this lesson in stride, and won't get burned too harshly by it. It's gotten some attention by the MSM, as it was mentioned on CNN's Inside Politics (considering their low ratings, do they even count as the MSM?). They even mentioned Michelle Malkin's statement of the Reid aide possibly suing him for libel (nice way to throw a bone out there) on LaShawn Barber's site. I wouldn't be surprised if it's mentioned on MSNBC this afternoon too.
There is one point where I agree with Malkin: he should burn them back. If he has the phone numbers, hunt them down and expose them for what they did. Revenge is a dish served cold.
Posted at 05:35 pm by Expertise
Link Me
Home
|
|
 |