|
Now, chalk it up to the fact that I didn't post this soon enough, or my blog viewership is so small that my messages don't spread wide enough. But the message was something that people should have took heed of. One of those people is Markos Zuniga, the owner of the Daily Kos. On Friday, Kos commented on a passage by David Corn from The Nation. Corn said: And to this, Kos responds: It's a shameful barb, and although he probably won't admit it, I bet it's one that Kos wishes he never made. Yesterday the internet campaign leader of Howard Dean's 2004 presidential campaign, Zephyr Teachout of Zonkette, made a public omission of her own: Now, Kos for the most part was being duped, and thought they really wanted him and Armstrong, who runs the MyDD blog, for technical support. You can't fault him there. He also put up a disclaimer, which said he was being paid to provide technical support to the campaign. This isn't a question about ethics in the case of Kos, as he's pretty clear on that end. However, now that we know there are leftists that are being paid by the politicans that they comment on, should we follow Kos's lead and assume that all of the left-wing commentators are being paid off as well? So, what chu talkin bout, Willis? Ha. Maybe you guys will take caution in choosing your words when the next big story hits. But hey, at least Kos will have his name in the news. He'll be in tomorrow's Wall Street Journal. |
| the man January 20, 2005 04:52 PM PST more conservative bullshit | ||
| Expert January 15, 2005 03:43 AM PST I think I stated in the post that Kos was clear as far as ethics was concerned. In fact, I believe most of the bloggers criticizing Kos for the disclaimer - saying it wasn't specific enough - are barking up the wrong tree. The problem lies in the statement Kos made in reference to all conservative pundits being on the take. He was wrong for that, and it's come back to haunt him. | ||
| Charlie T. January 14, 2005 01:58 PM PST Your analogy is faulty, because anyone who read Daily Kos during the period Kos worked for Dean saw the disclaimer and knew about the relationship (and Armstrong didn't even post on MyDD during his time with Dean, so he could have hardly promoted the Dean candidacy there). Whereas Armstrong Williams' acceptance of taxpayer money to promote NCLB was not widely known if it was known at all. As long as there's full disclosure, what's the big deal? | ||
| Leave a Comment: |